From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52888) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uwv3h-0005T5-Sg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:07:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uwv3c-0002lR-8R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:07:53 -0400 Received: from mail-bk0-f45.google.com ([209.85.214.45]:46590) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uwv3c-0002lM-26 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:07:48 -0400 Received: by mail-bk0-f45.google.com with SMTP id je9so2831151bkc.4 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 07:07:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: peter.crosthwaite@petalogix.com In-Reply-To: <51DD1A7F.1040809@suse.de> References: <51DD1A7F.1040809@suse.de> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:07:46 +1000 Message-ID: From: Peter Crosthwaite Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH arm-devs v1 1/2] hw/timer: Introduce ARM A9 Global Timer. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= Cc: devel@thom.fr.eu.org, Peter Maydell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster Hi Andreas, On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Andreas F=E4rber wrote: > Am 10.07.2013 09:41, schrieb Peter Maydell: >> On 10 July 2013 06:08, wrote: >>> From: Peter Crosthwaite >>> >>> The ARM A9 MPCore has a timer that is global to all CPUs in the mpcore. >>> The timer is shared but each CPU has a private independent comparator >>> and interrupt. >>> >>> Original version contributed by Francois LEGAL. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite >>> --- >>> Francois, do you want to re-add your SOB? I have changed the device >>> a lot since your V2. > > If you have a DCO for a patch you're reusing, you should never "drop" it > from your patch. You can still leave the textual explanation there. > >> The usual way to indicate this (assuming Francois signed off the >> original patchset) is something like: >> >> Signed-off-by: Original Author >> [You: ] >> Signed-off-by: Your Name > > Add to that, the difference between From and SOB indicates that you did > more than just cosmetic touches. For example, when I wrote from scratch > a new SoC QOM object I used my From and the original author's Sob (to > put the blame on me while recording the DCO), whereas when I purely > updated code to MemoryRegions, Coding Style, QOM casts, etc. I use the > original author's From and [AF: ...]. This is much more than a stylistic change, its very heavily refactored. I t= hink its better to --reset-author but ill bring the SOB accross. Whereas with P2 all I have done is split of the MPCore changes from original file verbatim,= so I guess that should be original author. Regards, Peter > > Andreas > > -- > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany > GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe= rg >