From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54768) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UEryb-0002wW-Lp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 21:56:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UErya-0004eX-I9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 21:56:33 -0400 Received: from mail-bk0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:4008:c01::231]:34786) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UErya-0004eR-Ap for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 21:56:32 -0400 Received: by mail-bk0-f49.google.com with SMTP id w11so1469129bku.36 for ; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 18:56:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: peter.crosthwaite@petalogix.com In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 11:56:30 +1000 Message-ID: From: Peter Crosthwaite Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Cross-compiling QEMU for ARM List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: David Holsgrove , Leonid Bloch , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi Peter, On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > Question for the qemu-devel folks: does anybody have a situation > where they genuinely need to pass --cpu to configure (ie the > autodetection is wrong or insufficient)? [configure does mention > one case, which is when cross-compiling to x86 Darwin and SunOS, > but the latter at least is busted anyway because later on we > do things based on SunOS uname results which there is no way > to override for the cross-compile case.] I'm tempted to suggest > we should drop --cpu entirely... We are are using --cpu=i386 to cross build QEMU as a 32-bit binary on 64 bit platforms. Although admittedly that is still failing to build due to werror issues. Regards, Peter > > -- PMM >