From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48985)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.crosthwaite@petalogix.com>) id 1Z7AWO-0004Dl-1U
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:48:56 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.crosthwaite@petalogix.com>) id 1Z7AWG-0002r9-Ch
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:48:55 -0400
Received: from mail-yk0-f176.google.com ([209.85.160.176]:35977)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.crosthwaite@petalogix.com>) id 1Z7AWG-0002r5-8q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:48:48 -0400
Received: by ykdr198 with SMTP id r198so139296053ykd.3
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 15:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: peter.crosthwaite@petalogix.com
In-Reply-To: <53AC2B9B.40801@redhat.com>
References: <1403355502-12288-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<1403355502-12288-5-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA_TiDJKduwitTsKXSp1VWZJ0SjEnJrqqPUM2L2cDBmT+A@mail.gmail.com>
	<53AC2B9B.40801@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 15:48:46 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEgOgz6U=j8333VKv_FuFYFoqo=SDq_=x4xwPNVQKDdZp2HhLw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 04/11] linux-user: arm: set CPSR.E
 correctly for BE8 mode
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> Il 26/06/2014 16:15, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
>>
>> (There is code for handling CPSR_E in the kernel's start_thread()
>> macro but that is actually only called for starting new
>> processes, AFAICT.)
>
>
> Yes, you're right.
>

So I am struggling on figuring out the need to have this extra state
of signal_cpsr_e. Is it still needed and to follow up, would something
similar be needed for SCTLR.E0E on AA64 support?

Regards,
Peter

> Paolo
>