From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6329987466337976320 X-Received: by 10.28.43.129 with SMTP id r123mr628437wmr.6.1473862693744; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:18:13 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.25.72.142 with SMTP id v136ls39485lfa.53.gmail; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:18:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.46.5.140 with SMTP id 134mr578500ljf.6.1473862693102; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:18:13 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-x241.google.com (mail-lf0-x241.google.com. [2a00:1450:4010:c07::241]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w134si718456wmf.3.2016.09.14.07.18.13 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:18:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of daniel.baluta@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c07::241 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c07::241; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of daniel.baluta@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c07::241 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=daniel.baluta@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: by mail-lf0-x241.google.com with SMTP id l131so729528lfl.0 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:18:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7nXbUUMT+6dFUjSGFU2M9mg3TQe7LXpSstbGBgEtlE8=; b=TWyhAdhKq/97iupCt0mt2F4ux11M6v2tBcQhs0hcYj0UiAaBDDhVdwO2mMCql1b3+B VxWPC5R06An+C7brENxRyYMZv9ssrRvZ4ISi1tWdh7h1lhxO20JXoe6k+us/BHuYtvto 4CS5AbakFgqVLFZjXoP50klS9j3KEH7e+mwWm982aZjN4qEdJGqc4hhnBsche0jH8NHJ tcm2dv8XEesP5U4lBUy8It9FaQMbMeAPRr7HIm+lJi61nhj3rdcNXFlac0r5WmJ/Hp1W HWAhDx5j8DU2QUl/N7Rni+AQ3UiIvovkDInDV5zqd/jBBCitd0UBLa2CsS1CBXAxdxbM Zk5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7nXbUUMT+6dFUjSGFU2M9mg3TQe7LXpSstbGBgEtlE8=; b=RPTWfVDGxUMd3A/qnyIIQdRtPgetjaHgiH0RyWf/MUj/QP2sxl6S2Yw1AWhQHN8oqv SFd2q8HuKKYhHNjG3bj0qF+PEQD7om7GAB88PayRnhbqTxVjNWSsdYtqA3mIziCXxTD1 RMcs1w3Bfc/ykpZ7Df8lnb9bXmS42gz2NLtKNDpGKlWHV6SjqbhGxmrKai+3U4FKrNC0 69el6gi7K/YgfIWhCMoJBKQMjNEbv1zoEOiMJlojjEA9LG9/yR/i6A2sZPqlIFwD5ZIX veqquooLmloR6xfOImRoGSYKDWmCmezK3KwAFvEhUCK70OWAeqaZrw6owFmP4C8agQ0U BulA== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNzaRxXK2LNOasC7fjascWUGUHa5OhttU1yoO2St8yJWcUL9mmCyZyshsh1NQCobCm9AnNju6G74jzudQ== X-Received: by 10.46.71.149 with SMTP id u143mr1253462lja.18.1473862692717; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:18:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.208.15 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:18:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160914141041.GA2039@katie-Inspiron-5748> References: <20160914010414.GA441@katie-Inspiron-5748> <20160914051142.GA7205@d830.WORKGROUP> <20160914141041.GA2039@katie-Inspiron-5748> From: Daniel Baluta Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 17:18:12 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] staging: iio: ad5933: align arguments on new line with open parenthesis To: Katie Dunne Cc: Alison Schofield , outreachy-kernel , Lars-Peter Clausen , "Hennerich, Michael" , Jonathan Cameron Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Katie Dunne wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:11:43PM -0700, Alison Schofield wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 06:04:14PM -0700, Katie Dunne wrote: >> > knaack.h@gmx.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net >> > Bcc: >> > Subject: [PATCH] staging: iio: ad5933: align arguments on new line with open parenthesis >> > Reply-To: >> >> Hi Katie, >> Something odd happened just above here...with the cc list and subject >> repeating. > > Thanks Alison. Something weird happened with mutt where the subject > disappeared so I had type it twice. I will try to figure out what went > wrong. > >> It looks like some of these can be pulled into less lines. If it fits >> within 80 chars, it's fine on one line. See below. > > I wasn't sure if I could do this in the same patch, but that makes > sense. > > I will send a v2. Hi Katie, Just to make sure that everything works fine, it's always a good idea to send the email first only to yourself. Then if it looks good send it to everybody :). I usually find late problems with this approach. thanks, daniel.