From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BA7E405 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:27:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD3648B for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:27:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibxm9 with SMTP id xm9so38841933wib.1 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 09:27:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55BAE39F.9060705@oracle.com> References: <55BAE39F.9060705@oracle.com> From: Bjorn Helgaas Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:27:38 -0500 Message-ID: To: Sasha Levin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Self nomination List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Sasha Levin wrote: > Mainly I'd like to talk about improving testing around the kernel, both by catching bugs > and by improving the quality of debug output that comes out of the kernel. What sort of debug output improvements are you interested in? I spend a fair amount of time converting to dev_printk and %pR. They make the kernel more consistent and approachable, but they're minor and I'm sure you have more substantive things in mind.