From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from am1ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com ([213.199.154.204] helo=am1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SDHsW-00045h-8W for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 18:07:12 +0200 Received: from mail26-am1-R.bigfish.com (10.3.201.239) by AM1EHSOBE003.bigfish.com (10.3.204.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:58:08 +0000 Received: from mail26-am1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail26-am1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358BD26098D for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:58:08 +0000 (UTC) X-SpamScore: -13 X-BigFish: VS-13(zzbb2dI9371I1b0bM1432N98dKzz1202hzz8275bhz2dh2a8h668h839h8e2h8e3hbe9k) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:70.37.183.190; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:mail.freescale.net; RD:none; EFVD:NLI Received: from mail26-am1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail26-am1 (MessageSwitch) id 1333036687635_11131; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:58:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from AM1EHSMHS017.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.201.237]) by mail26-am1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8433200067 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:58:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.freescale.net (70.37.183.190) by AM1EHSMHS017.bigfish.com (10.3.207.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:58:06 +0000 Received: from 039-SN1MPN1-001.039d.mgd.msft.net ([169.254.1.230]) by 039-SN1MMR1-001.039d.mgd.msft.net ([10.84.1.13]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.003; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:58:04 -0500 From: McClintock Matthew-B29882 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Thread-Topic: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: define TUNE_PKGARCH for powerpc/powerpc-nf Thread-Index: AQHNDWcWaFGUF6IwukC6rEwZIl9i0w== Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:58:04 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1332877869-12195-1-git-send-email-kergoth@gmail.com> <1332877869-12195-3-git-send-email-kergoth@gmail.com> <4F72219A.2020301@windriver.com> <4F723618.6060104@windriver.com> <4F723B78.2060308@windriver.com> <4F7481FE.3020505@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <4F7481FE.3020505@windriver.com> Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [99.47.177.27] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: define TUNE_PKGARCH for powerpc/powerpc-nf X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: McClintock Matthew-B29882 , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:07:12 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: <336112D35C572842B3156E46E383BB29@mgd.freescale.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Mark Hatle wro= te: > On 3/28/12 11:54 PM, Chris Larson wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 9:47 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 >> =A0wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Chris Larson >>> =A0wrote: >>>>> >>>>> If you can explain why the override isn't overriding the default >>>>> TUNE_PKGARCH (and it's intentional and not a bug), and we can >>>>> consistently >>>>> modify all of the elements... I'm happy to accept the changes to all = of >>>>> the >>>>> tunings. >>>> >>>> >>>> See above. It's not an override. And plenty of files already specify >>>> TUNE_PKGARCH_tune-, so I don't see how it'd be inconsistent to >>>> do so for the defaults, personally. >>> >>> >>> If no one else has complained so far it makes me believe they are not >>> missing any TUNE_PKGARCH_tune- =A0then. >> >> >> I don't understand the point you're attempting to make here. > > > Just an FYI -- I've not forgotten about this.. I'm going to look into wha= t > is currently implemented and figure out how to get it to be consistent.. > things have definitely changed since the initial implementation, and thin= gs > are no longer consistent. > > Hopefully I'll have an update later today. Just for some background: I added the TUNEPKG_ARCH =3D TUNE_PKGARCH_tune-$DEFAULTTUNE bit because it seemed to make sense and it was missing from this list: meta/conf/bitbake.conf:TUNE_FEATURES ??=3D "${TUNE_FEATURES_tune-${DEFAULTT= UNE}}" meta/conf/bitbake.conf:PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS ??=3D "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-${DEFAULTTUNE}}" Also it seemed silly (at the time admittedly) to set TUNE_PKGARCH based off a value in TUNE_FEATURES and using bb functions to do this when the way I went with was simply setting a value. I did miss that the default case no longer works properly unless you have a TUNE_PKGARCH_tune-{powerpc,powerpc-nf,powerpc64} =3D {powerpc,powerpc-nf,powerpc64} set in the default arch files. Anyways, I'm not stuck on one particular method at the time I was trying to get ppce5500 multilib working properly. -M=