From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id F1F04E00C74; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 09:00:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.218.43 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source * [209.85.218.43 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] Received: from mail-oi0-f43.google.com (mail-oi0-f43.google.com [209.85.218.43]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DDA0E00C6D for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 09:00:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi0-f43.google.com with SMTP id d71so16852492oih.0 for ; Thu, 03 Aug 2017 09:00:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mcclintock.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=u6f23aYgXoZQx5RY0LkikX8J6FguWSLlJcWPBRx6FUM=; b=GQI+jed7helPXE6wrVeKCvlKKRHM1cZmI7KfJ3u3ctxtxFVvxArQxB2d1mJaWtabFP M/eiI38VHH5HlMdBpTUT1rSPlacg9YiWvftsUnkU1yQ3Yokbzj8fUQ1c/VI8PDYCym4/ R6IMyl+JNm/jVoiQz3VC8H6uGBlI+jf5/DwA4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=u6f23aYgXoZQx5RY0LkikX8J6FguWSLlJcWPBRx6FUM=; b=h/8GE9pXp05GyQBoZDrRBzfzyzU0F2ASZEUPt1jUl8LJZ/YiNSfWcV1OMVPG2mCOtG pu8OLhs5q1z23IuuODlJaCneSU2sY0RY5jFlfPiVxpeQk7SV13PG8+U3GHcP1KoRB42n ZKjEQ+59UnS8/EsPr0KOJD5N+WX/DQTiF60kK9AlVYAZURh8F6p4BpiHtYKHaPA3G4V6 gdCB6n1/kYRmo0AKEZnyBg9lCbAN70FQZIuaIj2npkixMOakgn3uByGN6l/S0grsj1tS l3SaejG6ecEMlkKn+/zCG0YxoSN6RqQ4F9UFWgT+a1hl6YhZ9I4abGJAMKVmxhJLflKl hkpg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113kyhMcktjZxvdwc6Y1gqCjY81MbdQyjGDV4+stNfhh2VfwX5UI 0OFyoMlgDUdmLykq/JRjmocOzMRU1fab X-Received: by 10.202.182.11 with SMTP id g11mr2260856oif.60.1501776034666; Thu, 03 Aug 2017 09:00:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.32.102 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 09:00:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Matthew McClintock Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 11:00:14 -0500 Message-ID: To: "Burton, Ross" Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" , "blackthirt33n ." Subject: Re: bitbake download only X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 16:00:36 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > Yes, > > bitbake core-image-minimal -c fetchall Or for more recent version of bitbake bitbake core-image-minimal --runall fetch -M