Re: RPM multilib package installation issue

[McClintock Matthew-B29882 <B29882@freescale.com>]

FYI: ipkg appears to work fine if you have
MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL and MULTILIB_PACKAGE_ARCH set.

Will file a bug shortly.

-M

On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com> wrote:
> On 9/2/11 1:36 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com> wrote:
>>> For everything I see, that should work.
>>>
>>> In classes/image.bbclass, RDEPENDS is augmented by the contents of
>>> IMAGE_INSTALL, LINGUAS_INSTALL, MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL, and NORMAL_FEATURE_INSTALL.
>>
>> The bitbake side is fine, It's getting put into RDEPENDS and all the
>> packages are beinh built properly. RPMs are built as well.
>>
>>> The place to start looking for this is within the log.do_rootfs in the rootfs
>>> directory you are working on.  You should see something that indicates it's
>>> trying to install the "lib64-perl".  (in the case of RPM, it should eventually
>>> rename it to "perl" -- but choose the 64-bit version.)
>>
>> However, I don't see code that invokes package_rpm.bbclass properly.
>> It looks like it could work, but no where is MLPREFIX set for image.
>> There is some override or something missing on my end or in the code
>> to properly export these vars for the ML rpm install scenario.
>>
>> Further more, from what I see no where in rootfs_rpm.bbclass do we
>> pass MULTILIB_PACKAGE_INSTALL into the list of packages to be
>> installed... thus they fall off. ipk looks like it might have this
>> stuff done.
>
> This looks like a typo of some sorts:
>
> image.bbclass:RDEPENDS += "${IMAGE_INSTALL} ${LINGUAS_INSTALL}
> ${MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL} ${NORMAL_FEATURE_INSTALL}"
>
> image.bbclass:export MULTILIB_PACKAGE_INSTALL ?= "${MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL}"
>
> So you should be setting MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL, this should feed into the
> RDEPENDS and that should in turn seed the roofs stuff..  So there looks to be a
> disconnect of some sort between the implementation of the image.bbclass and the
> individual package_*.bbclasses.
>
> (The only place I see MULTILIB_PACKAGE_INSTALL is in rootfs_ipk.bbclass.)
>
> The way the rootfs_rpm (which uses package_rpm) gets the list of things to
> install is via:
>
> package_linguas=INSTALL_PACKAGES_LINGUAS_RPM=LINGUAS_INSTALL
>
> package_to_install=INSTALL_PACKAGES_NORMAL_RPM=PACKAGE_INSTALL="${IMAGE_INSTALL}
>  ${FEATURE_INSTALL}"
>
> package_attemptonly=INSTALL_PACKAGES_ATTEMPTONLY_RPM=PACKAGE_INSTALL_ATTEMPTONLY=FEATURE_INSTALL_OPTIONAL
>
> Where you see RPM above, replace with ipk and deb and the same ordering should
> be used.  So based on that, RDEPENDS is being populated from the
> "image.bbclass", but nothing is populating the MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL like it
> should be.  Either it needs to be added to the 'PACKAGE_INSTALL' or something
> similar needs to be invented and added to each of the rootfs_* types.  (Note,
> there needs to be a translation step between the definition of
> MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL and where it's used.. since things like "zlib" can become
> "libz1" via name translation.  (translation happens in runtime_mapping_rename if
> I remember correctly.. in image.bbclass)
>
> I'd suggest you file a bug about this in the yocto system.  We'll get someone to
> work on it...  (I agree it's broken BTW..)  The ipk usage may turn out to be an
> example for the deb and rpm usage... but the three should continue to be in sync
> for most of it.
>
> --Mark
>
>> -M
>>
>> -M
>
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>