From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from tx2ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com ([65.55.88.15] helo=tx2outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SIMMT-0000gN-LV for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:55:05 +0200 Received: from mail22-tx2-R.bigfish.com (10.9.14.253) by TX2EHSOBE007.bigfish.com (10.9.40.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:45:44 +0000 Received: from mail22-tx2 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail22-tx2-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13D730016E for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:45:44 +0000 (UTC) X-SpamScore: -9 X-BigFish: VS-9(zz9371Ic89bh1432N98dKzz1202hzz8275ch8275bhz2dh2a8h668h839h8e2h8e3hbe9i) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:70.37.183.190; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:mail.freescale.net; RD:none; EFVD:NLI Received: from mail22-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail22-tx2 (MessageSwitch) id 1334245543691891_27071; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:45:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TX2EHSMHS015.bigfish.com (unknown [10.9.14.251]) by mail22-tx2.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4284420084 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:45:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.freescale.net (70.37.183.190) by TX2EHSMHS015.bigfish.com (10.9.99.115) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:45:42 +0000 Received: from 039-SN1MPN1-001.039d.mgd.msft.net ([169.254.1.132]) by 039-SN1MMR1-003.039d.mgd.msft.net ([10.84.1.16]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.003; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:45:42 -0500 From: McClintock Matthew-B29882 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Thread-Topic: [OE-core] Yocto Project 1.2 M4 schedule Thread-Index: AQHNGMNQhZ+TZMKgekW4ywXi0lVeyg== Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:45:41 +0000 Message-ID: References: <7E680CB2A76BB8438D08CF13C09FC53A46B06325@FMSMSX151.amr.corp.intel.com> <4F84D58F.8020608@gmail.com> <1334221321.31685.24.camel@ted> <4543FDF1-0512-4B36-ABB3-DBB957B86E88@dominion.thruhere.net> <20120412165158.52c84ded@eb-e6520> In-Reply-To: <20120412165158.52c84ded@eb-e6520> Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [99.47.177.27] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com Subject: Re: Yocto Project 1.2 M4 schedule X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: McClintock Matthew-B29882 , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:55:06 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: <85B02EE37112DF4CB6AFCBE44F755369@mgd.freescale.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Eric B=E9nard wrote: > Le Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:39:52 +0200, > Koen Kooi a =E9crit : > >> >> Op 12 apr. 2012, om 16:24 heeft Otavio Salvador het volgende geschreven: >> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 06:29, Koen Kooi = wrote: >> >> I'm still a big fan of using 'yoctoproject-1.2' as substring for tags= and branches. The objections I heard to that didn't make sense to me, but = I see this as a purely technical matter where others see it as something di= fferent :) >> > >> > OE-Core branch could be 2012-1. >> >> Yes, but experience has shown that PHBs and new yocto users want to see = 'yocto' in the name and go apeshit when it's missing. OTOH people will hate= whatever gets chosen, so let's get this over with and pick a name and stro= ngly recommend other layers to adopt it as well. >> > FWIW I'm also in favor of a tag yocto-1.2 for the OE-core release which > yocto 1.2 is based on. This is one of those things were someone just needs to decide or a group of people need to vote. It's not worth debating anymore - you can't make everyone happy. As long as it's tagged though. -M=