All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
	 dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni: fix kernel deadlock when using mlx devices
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:56:26 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAF+s_FxF_s3ETF2Ewt-_nPDEXyg0zBroNyL-Rz0W8mX883bsZQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200727105255.74981391@hermes.lan>

Hi,

Didn't see this patch previously, but we came up with the same idea
internally and also faced a hang during the application shutdown.
We didn't dig deep, but it occurred in kni_release function.

Igor

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 8:53 PM Stephen Hemminger <
stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 18:33:08 +0100
> Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > On 5/6/2020 1:14 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 16:17:57 +0100
> > > Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >> 17/01/2020 17:43, Ferruh Yigit:
> > >>> On 12/22/2019 5:55 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > >>>> This fixes a deadlock when using KNI with bifurcated drivers.
> > >>>> Bringing kni device up always times out when using Mellanox
> > >>>> devices.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The kernel KNI driver sends message to userspace to complete
> > >>>> the request. For the case of bifurcated driver, this may involve
> > >>>> an additional request to kernel to change state. This request
> > >>>> would deadlock because KNI was holding the RTNL mutex.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This was a bad design which goes back to the original code.
> > >>>> A workaround is for KNI driver to drop RTNL while waiting.
> > >>>> To prevent the device from disappearing while the operation
> > >>>> is in progress, it needs to hold reference to network device
> > >>>> while waiting.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> As an added benefit, an useless error check can also be removed.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Fixes: 3fc5ca2f6352 ("kni: initial import")
> > >>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> > >>>> ---
> > >>>
> > >>> This patch cause a hang on my server, not sure what exactly was the
> problem but
> > >>> kernel log was continuously printing "Cannot send to req_q". Will
> dig more.
> > >>
> > >> Ferruh, did you have a chance to check what is hanging?
> > >> Stephen, is there any news on your side?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > It did not hang when I tested it. The bug report is still open
> > >
> >
> > Sorry for the delay, since I am working remotely I was worried about
> loosing the
> > connection to my server, finally I did create a virtual environment to
> test again.
> >
> > I confirm the hang observed %100 when two different process updates the
> kni
> > interface, like two different process sets the mtu. Without this patch
> this
> > works fine.
> >
> > I understand the motivation of the patch, but with change there is a
> possibility
> > to hang the server, which we can't allow, need to find another way. Can
> updating
> > mlx interface wait KNI interface operation to complete?
>
> Still KNI driver is broken. Calling userspace with RTNL held is
> fundamentally
> broken design. If KNI were to be incorporated in upstream kernel, then the
> netdev
> developer would see this.
>
> What ever solution you think is best.
> I will continue to recommend against anyone using KNI.
>

      reply	other threads:[~2020-07-28  8:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-22 17:55 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni: fix kernel deadlock when using mlx devices Stephen Hemminger
2020-01-17 16:43 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-03-18 15:17   ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-06  0:14     ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-07-27 17:33       ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-07-27 17:52         ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-07-28  8:56           ` Igor Ryzhov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAF+s_FxF_s3ETF2Ewt-_nPDEXyg0zBroNyL-Rz0W8mX883bsZQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=iryzhov@nfware.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.