From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933204Ab2DKUXv (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:23:51 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:60464 "EHLO mail-wg0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755356Ab2DKUXu (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:23:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120411194751.GA7055@samfundet.no> References: <05cc973152bedd39bf37fa1222960c2a2c438500.1334137680.git.nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> <20120411194751.GA7055@samfundet.no> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:23:49 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] MAINTAINERS: remove non-responding web link for atmel_usba driver From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=E5vard_Skinnemoen?= To: Hans-Christian Egtvedt Cc: Nicolas Ferre , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, Josh.wu@atmel.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: > With regards to this specific driver, I am unsure how much information the > wiki really gives, it is probably out of sync as well now... Hmm, yeah. The patches on that page are certainly useless, as they were merged a long time ago. I don't think the "known issues" are really valid anymore either. Havard From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hskinnemoen@gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=E5vard_Skinnemoen?=) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:23:49 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 5/5] MAINTAINERS: remove non-responding web link for atmel_usba driver In-Reply-To: <20120411194751.GA7055@samfundet.no> References: <05cc973152bedd39bf37fa1222960c2a2c438500.1334137680.git.nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> <20120411194751.GA7055@samfundet.no> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: > With regards to this specific driver, I am unsure how much information the > wiki really gives, it is probably out of sync as well now... Hmm, yeah. The patches on that page are certainly useless, as they were merged a long time ago. I don't think the "known issues" are really valid anymore either. Havard