From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966435AbcCPKRa (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2016 06:17:30 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]:38657 "EHLO mail-wm0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966153AbcCPKR2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2016 06:17:28 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160316101457.GC2195@8bytes.org> References: <1458079926-18716-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@kernel.org> <20160316101457.GC2195@8bytes.org> From: Oded Gabbay Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:16:57 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFT] iommu/amd: use subsys_initcall() on amdv2 iommu To: Joerg Roedel Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 09:02:43AM +0200, Oded Gabbay wrote: >> fwiw, we currently have this covered by the ugly hack of putting iommu >> subsystem in front of gpu subsystem in the main drivers makefile (See >> 1bacc894c227fad8a727eb99728df708eba57654) > > Sure, but the above is a less ugly hack to solve the problem. So the > question is, would that work too? > > > Joerg > In theory it should, but I would prefer that it would be tested on actual hardware. Oded