From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52446) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1guaFR-0003rL-Sy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 04:57:35 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1guaFR-0003EP-5O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 04:57:33 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-x344.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::344]:33579) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1guaFQ-0003DH-VZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 04:57:33 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-x344.google.com with SMTP id i20so15642978otl.0 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 01:57:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190206052857.5077-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org> <0334b231-fa3e-210c-ea9e-9d7bb7b21d1f@linaro.org> <28da85ff-c718-bd3e-ddca-18772decd777@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <28da85ff-c718-bd3e-ddca-18772decd777@linaro.org> From: Peter Maydell Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 09:57:20 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] target/arm: Implement ARMv8.3-JSConv List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson Cc: QEMU Developers On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 21:28, Richard Henderson wrote: > > On 2/14/19 1:10 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: > > On 2/14/19 5:53 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 at 05:29, Richard Henderson > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Changes since v1: > >>> * Typo fixed in patch 2, which had scrogged FMOV > >>> * Return 0 for NaN, as for any other ARM fp conversion. > >>> > >>> > >>> r~ > >>> > >>> > >>> Richard Henderson (3): > >>> target/arm: Force result size into dp after operation > >>> target/arm: Restructure disas_fp_int_conv > >>> target/arm: Implement ARMv8.3-JSConv > >> > >> I've applied patches 1 and 2 to target-arm.next; 3 has a bug in it, > >> I think. > > > > Please dequeue patch 2; patch 3 has more than one bug in it, and I need to > > rewrite patch 2 as well. > > Grr. That's patch 1, "force result size into dp" that I want dequeued. > Of course, now I've seen your pull request, so if that's already gone through, > I guess I can smoosh a revert with my rewrite? I saw this before pushing the merge, so I've removed both patches 1 and 2 from target-arm.next and will resend the pullreq. thanks -- PMM