From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50541) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctIQV-0005xX-1n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:34:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctIQU-0007AH-1d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:34:35 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::234]:33838) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctIQT-00079m-RR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:34:33 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-x234.google.com with SMTP id l43so28240374wre.1 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:34:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20170328201623.GD20211@cbox> From: Peter Maydell Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 19:34:11 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] host stalls when qemu-system-aarch64 with kvm and pflash List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Radha Mohan Cc: Christoffer Dall , QEMU Developers , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" On 29 March 2017 at 19:17, Radha Mohan wrote: >> I will also try with qemu 2.8 and see. > > Same issue with 2.8.0 and 2.7.1 qemu version. Thanks for checking -- good to know it's not a regression on the QEMU side. (If you can soft-lockup the host it's clearly a host kernel bug, but it might have been that we changed something recently to provoke it.) thanks -- PMM From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Maydell Subject: Re: host stalls when qemu-system-aarch64 with kvm and pflash Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 19:34:11 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20170328201623.GD20211@cbox> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED7540284 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:32:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jlx6NwqdE4Y0 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:32:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-wr0-f174.google.com (mail-wr0-f174.google.com [209.85.128.174]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF7CF40019 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:32:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wr0-f174.google.com with SMTP id k6so21453505wre.2 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:34:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu To: Radha Mohan Cc: Christoffer Dall , QEMU Developers , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" List-Id: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu On 29 March 2017 at 19:17, Radha Mohan wrote: >> I will also try with qemu 2.8 and see. > > Same issue with 2.8.0 and 2.7.1 qemu version. Thanks for checking -- good to know it's not a regression on the QEMU side. (If you can soft-lockup the host it's clearly a host kernel bug, but it might have been that we changed something recently to provoke it.) thanks -- PMM