From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52243) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhd8v-0004MO-T3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 08:39:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhd8q-0006mw-Sj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 08:39:25 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-f53.google.com ([209.85.213.53]:35072) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhd8q-0006mr-P2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 08:39:20 -0400 Received: by vkao3 with SMTP id o3so38862376vka.2 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 05:39:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <560D28A1.4040706@redhat.com> References: <1443389342-2186-1-git-send-email-somlo@cmu.edu> <1443389342-2186-5-git-send-email-somlo@cmu.edu> <560A6A90.3070807@redhat.com> <20150929182613.GY2080@HEDWIG.INI.CMU.EDU> <560BB794.9010600@redhat.com> <20151001122242.GJ23832@HEDWIG.INI.CMU.EDU> <560D28A1.4040706@redhat.com> From: Peter Maydell Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 13:39:00 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/5] acpi: arm: add fw_cfg device node to dsdt List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Laszlo Ersek Cc: Andrew Jones , Matt Fleming , Eduardo Habkost , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , "Gabriel L. Somlo" , Ard Biesheuvel , QEMU Developers , Leif Lindholm , Paolo Bonzini , Gerd Hoffmann , Shannon Zhao , Igor Mammedov , =?UTF-8?Q?Marc_Mar=C3=AD?= , Kevin OConnor , Richard Henderson On 1 October 2015 at 13:35, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 10/01/15 14:22, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote: >> I'm noticing that even on 32-bit arm there are ACPI tables generated and >> inserted into fw_cfg, so is there any reason OTHER than lack of firmware >> support for ACPI not being supported on 32-bit arm ? This is mostly just that we didn't bother to suppress them for 32-bit boots, though they're useless there. > I think Ard was speaking about the guest kernel (his pointer certainly > looks like a kernel repo). With regard to firmware, edk2's > ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtQemu.dsc builds just fine for 32-bit ARM guests. > > So, it's not a QEMU or guest firmware problem; I think it's a guest > kernel problem. Only if you think ACPI support is a requirement. It's not for 32-bit; there's no compelling reason to implement it there. thanks -- PMM