From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54427) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtErC-00036G-Bg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 11:54:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtErA-0004vc-Ql for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 11:54:58 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-x344.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::344]:38937) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtEr8-0004rO-DG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 11:54:56 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-x344.google.com with SMTP id n8so18620109otl.6 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 08:54:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190207160617.1142-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> <20190211165026.GJ27585@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190211165026.GJ27585@redhat.com> From: Peter Maydell Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 16:54:40 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/18] Chardev patches List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= Cc: =?UTF-8?B?TWFyYy1BbmRyw6kgTHVyZWF1?= , QEMU Developers On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 16:50, Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 = wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 05:05:59PM +0100, Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau wrote: > > The following changes since commit 632351e0e1a861f2eaf709b053c53f96a122= 5825: > > > > Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/elmarco/tags/dump-pull-request'= into staging (2019-02-07 14:20:46 +0000) > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > https://github.com/elmarco/qemu.git tags/chardev-pull-request > > > > for you to fetch changes up to df3afdedd23ade0c9de55cadeb1d85055689023f= : > > > > tests/test-char: add muxed chardev testing for open/close (2019-02-07= 16:18:25 +0100) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Various chardev fixes > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > BTW, I think as the maintainer sending the PULL request you are expected > to have added your own S-o-B to every patch, rather than just a R-B. Yes, indeed. Thanks for catching that. -- PMM