From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932509Ab3HNM5P (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Aug 2013 08:57:15 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f179.google.com ([209.85.217.179]:53051 "EHLO mail-lb0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932369Ab3HNM5O (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Aug 2013 08:57:14 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20130814124904.GQ23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20130812164548.GE23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812200628.GG23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812212149.GH23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812221250.GI23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812230408.GA4420@roeck-us.net> <20130814103346.GN23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130814124904.GQ23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> From: Peter Maydell Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 13:56:52 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+ To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Guenter Roeck , Paul Gortmaker , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Arnd Bergmann Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14 August 2013 13:49, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 01:44:44PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> Yes, I definitely think we should test on the hardware before we >> land yet another change to this PCI code that hasn't really been >> thoroughly tested on anything. I have the board/backplane on my >> desk but it'll be later in the week before I can do the testing >> (currently still messing with uboot config to get it to actually >> boot a kernel). > > Realview or Versatile? I still need to sort out Realview. PB926, so versatile. Let's get that one straightened out first, since at the moment the kernel has no realview PCI support at all. I should be able to get a PB1176 to go in the backplane for testing that, though. -- PMM From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37405) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V9adb-0003we-S4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 08:57:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V9adV-0004Ne-Nu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 08:57:19 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:53984) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V9adV-0004NU-GR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 08:57:13 -0400 Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id ec20so6843730lab.0 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 05:57:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20130814124904.GQ23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20130812164548.GE23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812200628.GG23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812212149.GH23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812221250.GI23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812230408.GA4420@roeck-us.net> <20130814103346.GN23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130814124904.GQ23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> From: Peter Maydell Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 13:56:52 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+ List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paul Gortmaker , Guenter Roeck , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" On 14 August 2013 13:49, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 01:44:44PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> Yes, I definitely think we should test on the hardware before we >> land yet another change to this PCI code that hasn't really been >> thoroughly tested on anything. I have the board/backplane on my >> desk but it'll be later in the week before I can do the testing >> (currently still messing with uboot config to get it to actually >> boot a kernel). > > Realview or Versatile? I still need to sort out Realview. PB926, so versatile. Let's get that one straightened out first, since at the moment the kernel has no realview PCI support at all. I should be able to get a PB1176 to go in the backplane for testing that, though. -- PMM From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: peter.maydell@linaro.org (Peter Maydell) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 13:56:52 +0100 Subject: [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+ In-Reply-To: <20130814124904.GQ23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20130812164548.GE23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812200628.GG23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812212149.GH23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812221250.GI23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130812230408.GA4420@roeck-us.net> <20130814103346.GN23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130814124904.GQ23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 14 August 2013 13:49, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 01:44:44PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> Yes, I definitely think we should test on the hardware before we >> land yet another change to this PCI code that hasn't really been >> thoroughly tested on anything. I have the board/backplane on my >> desk but it'll be later in the week before I can do the testing >> (currently still messing with uboot config to get it to actually >> boot a kernel). > > Realview or Versatile? I still need to sort out Realview. PB926, so versatile. Let's get that one straightened out first, since at the moment the kernel has no realview PCI support at all. I should be able to get a PB1176 to go in the backplane for testing that, though. -- PMM