From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47435) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hGWXz-0007KO-Go for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 18:27:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hGWXx-0005gU-8B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 18:27:23 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x341.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::341]:38649) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hGWXv-0005eX-VU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 18:27:20 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-x341.google.com with SMTP id e80so1750076ote.5 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:27:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190415154503.6758-1-berrange@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: Peter Maydell Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 23:27:06 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] usb-mtp: fix ObjectInfo request handling List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= Cc: QEMU Developers , Gerd Hoffmann , Bandan Das , Thomas Huth , Greg Kurz , Eric Blake On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 20:33, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 18:27, Peter Maydell wrote: > > Having thought a bit more I think I'd definitely like to apply > > just patch 2 for 4.0. Could people try to test that and confirm > > that it at least does not make the feature behave any worse? > > I've done a tentative merge test of patch 2, which is OK. > I'd like to push that either today or tomorrow (uk time): > objections? ...now pushed. thanks -- PMM From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A295FC10F13 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 22:28:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 653F22073F for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 22:28:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="GqtdICag" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 653F22073F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43633 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hGWYp-0007cJ-EH for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 18:28:15 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47435) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hGWXz-0007KO-Go for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 18:27:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hGWXx-0005gU-8B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 18:27:23 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x341.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::341]:38649) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hGWXv-0005eX-VU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 18:27:20 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-x341.google.com with SMTP id e80so1750076ote.5 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:27:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1Cb9TYEDwspChYr592GhQ77iVlLvf6ykAuCajVbUDPI=; b=GqtdICag5HCYhvb2mBnBmc074AzuzLr/QwOaxIs5g2ihSzmQM8Rw1u0s2FXP7GG1Dh ZZ9YTouyWH1H3qAsgo0/vvVbhv4YgGaghZIuAykMZZTNZ+IuxIWseMwHxg/4sKlGAvuz uAcVPxQk6ouM+CxScBpE+gYqgNLNt/2odaGyv6hrYD/aD4CQuNpWsLQPkZqPbROR/rjo 2erCAlPqSawcW/pdw/Zi5WTqADSdE0q3S76Wh79Mr0GxfSIeND/MsmoR05ejNRlpjL6s n9fmK8v2SrUn+YEqdb7UYLE9pQ1GgThaj+2N2QH0xTUsdAOsO3nGXjW3FjDEuxNVhVXZ ORFw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1Cb9TYEDwspChYr592GhQ77iVlLvf6ykAuCajVbUDPI=; b=rO5cziEIa326M1nTvpykxxbmryrc7XrSNKhqW4Sd7g8WsaScC5yZur95hmW60Bi1Hk 5FK8OO72LggxZenAdoR253S17hyiZfmyNN/lWKPad5a7foJYyzXZxHnKnkg5M8N8C0Tl vqY1BskiTRtfbsQPFZ9QnvTBfHwm4J49tci9Dp30Zol1tyJp4/5WNk8ldiPx4ixOD5Nn GO2VQS5c+NFZQn31MeuAN3BebFyATYRpPyAYS+fkNsfr2LjtItb/mojtbPgx2afg3cdW OcOoSE8g8nBRpj0d4dhTYbeXg1qekN5+mr5fcV2puKYc2NcapyLhMFL8SW1K3QoGcbUj 699A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXNmR1hJsM32SnqFb/v+eq+vwqT4JMwR+wajCTHHwkJvRuu7PiQ kZSpCiNwV6ShToM25qGimo5PCiu9jiMgCXQc29kkVQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxAPHw5Co2hEyRhQW0bct+f399ilKvMqxpSFDdZi0XwRl53KZyl37OP0fzfsbXO4PSHHbsaXjNtZ1SMOoK10Cs= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:3b44:: with SMTP id z62mr55029914otb.319.1555453638003; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:27:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190415154503.6758-1-berrange@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: Peter Maydell Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 23:27:06 +0100 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::341 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] usb-mtp: fix ObjectInfo request handling X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Thomas Huth , Greg Kurz , QEMU Developers , Bandan Das , Gerd Hoffmann Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Message-ID: <20190416222706.P9vhlBLkYO-bZmk-ngwGV8BrqjkKYVy9myu6vkobyMo@z> On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 20:33, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 18:27, Peter Maydell wrote: > > Having thought a bit more I think I'd definitely like to apply > > just patch 2 for 4.0. Could people try to test that and confirm > > that it at least does not make the feature behave any worse? > > I've done a tentative merge test of patch 2, which is OK. > I'd like to push that either today or tomorrow (uk time): > objections? ...now pushed. thanks -- PMM