From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34309) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bCnEm-0000MW-PD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:14:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bCnEh-0002Uw-DE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:14:31 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22a]:33007) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bCnEh-0002Us-8w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:14:27 -0400 Received: by mail-vk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id d185so94034791vkg.0 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 05:14:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Peter Maydell Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 13:14:07 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] proposal: drop linux-user unicore32 support from QEMU List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Riku Voipio Cc: QEMU Developers , Guan Xuetao On 20 May 2016 at 13:48, Riku Voipio wrote: > On torstaina 12. toukokuuta 2016 17.34.42 EEST, Peter Maydell wrote: >> We should either fix our unicore32 support to use the real >> syscall numbers, or just drop it; since nobody has touched >> linux-user/unicore32 since 2012, and there have been no >> commits to target-unicore32 that aren't generic "clean up >> all targets" type patches since 2012 or 2013, and nobody >> has ever complained that the syscall numbers are all broken, >> my initial inclination is to say we should just drop this. >> >> Opinions? > I agree. I don't have a test setup for unicore, so unicore > has seen nothing but compile testing... I've put a note in the 2.7 Changelog saying we're going to remove unicore32-linux-user in 2.8. thanks -- PMM