From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33234)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1Z2yBs-0001XW-MM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 04:50:25 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1Z2yBm-0004FD-0b
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 04:50:24 -0400
Received: from mail-vn0-f47.google.com ([209.85.216.47]:43772)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1Z2yBl-0004Ee-Sk
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 04:50:17 -0400
Received: by vnbg7 with SMTP id g7so74681vnb.10
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 01:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <000001d0a41a$b3f4bc50$1bde34f0$@samsung.com>
References: <000001d0a41a$b3f4bc50$1bde34f0$@samsung.com>
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 09:49:56 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA8OtrWYZU23aPY-v2mubLps0BYRmDQMpJs_8vSJnrwf-A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] PING: RE: [PATCH RFC V3 1/4] Use Aff1 with mpidr
 This is an improved and KVM-aware alternative to
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On 11 June 2015 at 08:46, Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com> wrote:
>  Hi Peter!
>
>> Hi. I think this patch largely makes sense, but I have some comments
>> below. If you want to fix these and resend as a standalone patch
>> I'm happy to apply that.
>
>  How are things going? I have resent v4 of this on the very same day,
> and got no reaction from you since then.

It's on my to-review list, but you only sent it three days ago.

PS: if you send your "ping" mails as actual follow ups to the
ptach you're pinging and don't change the Subject line, then I
will be able to find the patch you're referring to much more
easily. For me this email does not appear threaded into the
conversation on the patch mail...

thanks
-- PMM