From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1298BECE58E for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:07:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF9F8217F9 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:07:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="ARNNc0Iu" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CF9F8217F9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:39322 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iKJjY-0001JI-UV for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 06:07:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40662) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iKJaY-0004vT-94 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 05:57:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iKJaW-0005y7-D5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 05:57:57 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x32f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::32f]:46522) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iKJaW-0005xr-81 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 05:57:56 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id 89so16334980oth.13 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 02:57:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rGDRpST5sieXiVLkqxlJk2ENwgXbiyOjDZ1Qgf6nsnk=; b=ARNNc0Iu/vb60tOyhT6mUvKVX+0JXLfxjWdEvLr1JthyVrwlUktBrmWbNSyy2hlOsJ tdTC29hhnyQCs5WeMRKo1csEE46+freOFErR3kfgOFLUw8RdvRwrJRTgkffSXdF3SWMB j8sZaXwK0+Bjh7qcZjCe3I3/psUjst4kHk5/qqS3EAy6Au3zHEt+qTYrbasl7GxFPiPH YFSkEKZRwDb/xmZpdt1HOwJ9ZOWYEgrho7seIbJnCzv27pzsEdelb0+B9Do5rR1KDq5I nrHUxzavEeVna4Iw18xG/dQ3MKGMOrgSIgnhmJbxVfDrge/GXy1eYGfRa32AugxZgV95 tLMw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rGDRpST5sieXiVLkqxlJk2ENwgXbiyOjDZ1Qgf6nsnk=; b=lQROOcH78wdDJG3rYgW2kuhGWzVpNn+ySfplLqmh2+Ytv+yN02vD3dDlcZvol29qJq ZvtkmbzD8lokgXgurNLQmVFlVJAwPpg9Kw+Vsht5N/SaO6uNuOcWZPCuWRFFraKLKMI1 eVeTzE62uuG7kWCwbL/6gArf1RkLOPGScbd9FH3MWPIhxvpWfTbCUSC277eSOAkXaKkv 0b1iiXNPNEqtOGNMhQkvRipKGRrYLalhtPF3svMfQ7e3dBQRUzKn3LI245UCHwT7ZPJ7 6TO/OfJFGWTVgiiVI1U8YtXcoiz5z+VtWReDp2HvVK1OnSTvU1uhDgrVQ14OL4o3xVuk hcGw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVi/rwBlc2AyWnvSRnQSlMxjokGUtnFytAnsLVQq1lEYD1WIQXY nCG4bFZBTiPuKr1J/BiJW4tTyskbew2Bl7eJ0lFOaA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwFXfyOKCuHuz5/hhYNzZkNFglhTnWY1NNfSfCMriD2nHlgvG6jSZynQmPY6QMWgKlFRu9WmmGVllDCBRM62VQ= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:30c1:: with SMTP id r1mr28412069otg.91.1571133475325; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 02:57:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191015082708.GB22859@redhat.com> <0a4262f8-df07-e83e-0928-b6cf4e12800d@redhat.com> <20191015084722.GD22859@redhat.com> <20191015091444.GE22859@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20191015091444.GE22859@redhat.com> From: Peter Maydell Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:57:44 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: RFC: Why dont we move to newer capstone? To: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::32f X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Richard Henderson , Thomas Huth , =?UTF-8?B?TWFyYy1BbmRyw6kgTHVyZWF1?= , QEMU Developers , Lucien Murray-Pitts Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 at 10:14, Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 = wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:02:43AM +0200, Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau wrote: > > I suppose the same applies to dtc (1.4.2 required by qemu, but xenial > > has 1.4.0... so we have to wait until April 26, 2020? 18.04 LTS > > release date + 2y). > > Possibly - depends on scope of changes between 1.4.0 & 1.4.2 - maybe it > is easy to conditionally support 1.4.0 too. We need fdt_first_subnode() and fdt_next_subnode() which only came in in 1.4.2. thanks -- PMM