From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60107) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YH9EB-0002PW-M7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 05:55:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YH9E6-00044q-MT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 05:55:07 -0500 Received: from mail-la0-f49.google.com ([209.85.215.49]:39504) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YH9E6-00043i-G5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 05:55:02 -0500 Received: by mail-la0-f49.google.com with SMTP id gf13so22870765lab.8 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 02:55:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150130104833.GC27572@redhat.com> References: <54CA6CF6.7090308@redhat.com> <54CA7BF5.8020800@redhat.com> <54CA8637.2080306@redhat.com> <54CA8E37.8070009@redhat.com> <20150130095456.GB27572@redhat.com> <20150130104833.GC27572@redhat.com> From: Peter Maydell Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 10:54:41 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] address order of virtio-mmio devices List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Daniel P. Berrange" Cc: Laszlo Ersek , qemu devel list On 30 January 2015 at 10:48, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > Long term though it will be much better of AArch64 would just do PCI > instead of MMIO bus. Then we have proper device addressing which we > can control in a predictable manner that will be stable across hotplug > and unplug and migration. I hear there's work on PCI for AArch64 but > is there a near term ETA yet ? I need to review Alex's v3 patchset; if it doesn't have any issues it'll probably go into target-arm.next next week and hit mainline shortly after that. -- PMM