From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55996) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHoSs-0004YL-GS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 04:33:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHoSq-00050s-I3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 04:33:49 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-x22b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22b]:35419) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHoSq-00050l-8u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 04:33:48 -0400 Received: by mail-vk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id j2so12464691vkg.2 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 01:33:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87d1n1ener.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> References: <1466777957-5126-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <1466777957-5126-3-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <87wplbb0mt.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <87d1n1ener.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> From: Peter Maydell Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 09:33:28 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 2/5] tests: New make target check-source List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: Paolo Bonzini , QEMU Developers On 28 June 2016 at 09:19, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Peter Maydell writes: > >> On 27 June 2016 at 07:34, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>> Peter Maydell writes: >>>> This is third-party code. We're not going to change it, so >>>> we should avoid scanning it rather than adding tags which >>>> will get lost next time we do an update to a new upstream >>>> version... >>> >>> I can revive v1's blacklist for this directory. Any others? >> >> The clean-includes blacklist is >> XDIRREGEX='^(tests/tcg|tests/multiboot|pc-bios|disas/libvixl)' >> >> (which covers both 3rd-party imports and code which is intended to >> be built standalone and so doesn't follow QEMU's include >> rules.) > > Noted. > > What about linux-headers/ and include/standard-headers/? Mmm, clean-includes skips include/standard-headers (as a case in the switch statement, not via the blacklist regex). It doesn't skip linux-headers, though arguably it should. I think it just never complained about anything in linux-headers so I didn't identify it as something that needed to be skipped :-) thanks -- PMM