From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D9FC3A5A7 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 14:31:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18D49206B8 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 14:31:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="dFXq1MOy" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 18D49206B8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:33736 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i5WJz-0003eJ-7t for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 10:31:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49740) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i5WIo-0003C0-H3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 10:30:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i5WIn-0007mK-CL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 10:30:30 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::230]:36678) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i5WIn-0007kY-6L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 10:30:29 -0400 Received: by mail-oi1-x230.google.com with SMTP id k20so9560086oih.3 for ; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 07:30:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7FJcFskP6edwP+8yYUSQ515QB9NmEd0rx7CjKUECjRM=; b=dFXq1MOyTEkv6LQinsHTK3N26MxEEhnn2zZev17DtEzl0V6YSOX6RMbSK8ryf22K5h B5qBoiL2grLFTKYo+N2LCXFdkABaJcgahVM2Je+uo3D4MgYwzxcghG4cH8Z1cTMTRlbM 5UeW/jFYlcEE8Pz+6S0KnDUhKB7mLUbn3xrkEkb1mBxrgop2duoHDPaHMZwJkN/MtWW9 V2/D1wiuwFivEDgxAvOYi9BCu4yCzNPmK9JIUUnWkpz19o2AGUe714E2sNJo5tgkgO+h m7yxJgyJ3wBa5Rhxr7mKloZgvwVJFlRqMY33Eds33fVOy2pGzjSmXsHVAMMjN7nTEoug AsUQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7FJcFskP6edwP+8yYUSQ515QB9NmEd0rx7CjKUECjRM=; b=jYFvgVF//4E3xt4Gi22KAJxYkvfHnfz54dVuV11Y4ONntfByJlY34Kr5Z+v2m+SIGu vQ09fxBc3I7eeEkvUwxp53jVd1zNNh8jgrpDlZvWz8zgfL86eW8GWVCq66ltcT23zocs ZAcca1kyb/BQzo6DYfvMH2yB23InkER5znwrG3W2+OXpsvMfvnN9m5qhl3xtGEo2UQLu tz7RNVV/EYTBNqnqPNI7qXuynfVNmWCwHv1zE4nPM2u1qq7+s80AvhfwWuxjBMbqMMeh fTkroDesSbXMwtEjlCJQN3VjJK4MZvZGVZlGSuZFT9NpkQdv8XGNpwT2HJArPKgsZZyu 7w2w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWcx1Vk/nH3ia1gQVm0OcqXsjOGQx5DlEmYiTjO0b0GTIaxAMym yqkyMLvD3l0CO8/ayu4S1HQznE6kQ0RlDryjnPi+hA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyb4N7tTXtuq+EIBa3H1SISbIf/G52zcPjsrus8EcpsO8RmRVSuFeqEZt5omwnDJEX78WyHZfsBESovj3lq+J0= X-Received: by 2002:aca:4814:: with SMTP id v20mr3567514oia.98.1567607427540; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 07:30:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <21182000.2zn5IIMESL@silver> <20190902173432.20f2637b@bahia.lan> <2734436.Mu773bgsdE@silver> <87r24xqjoz.fsf@fsf.org> In-Reply-To: <87r24xqjoz.fsf@fsf.org> From: Peter Maydell Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 15:30:16 +0100 Message-ID: To: Ian Kelling Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::230 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] DMARC/DKIM and qemu-devel list settings X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Daniel P. Berrange" , Stefan Hajnoczi , Christian Schoenebeck , Greg Kurz , QEMU Developers , antonios.motakis@huawei.com, "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 20:11, Ian Kelling wrote: > I don't know who has the Qemu-devel list admin password, but whoever has > it can adopt the unmodified message fix by changing > dmarc_moderation_action to Accept here: > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/admin/qemu-devel/privacy/sender and > remove subject_prefix here > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/admin/qemu-devel/general I'm one of the list admins, at least for the main qemu-devel list; some of the sublists have different admins (and perhaps different settings -- there's no way to conveniently say "manage all 5 of these lists with the same policies, so it's easy for them to get out of sync, deliberately or accidentally). I have been considering whether we change how we're handling the DMARC problem for the list. I picked munge-the-email initially because I think we didn't really understand the consequences in terms of patchmail, and also because there was a group of subscribers who complained that they liked the [qemu-devel] tag, used it for filtering email, etc. I think overall my opinion has shifted to thinking that the downsides of munge-the-email are too great and we should indeed switch to not modifying the message at all. thanks -- PMM