From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=3.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28561C4360C for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:14:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB5F52075D for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="VncKr+TL" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EB5F52075D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:52250 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iDrwU-0007BX-Ut for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:13:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38082) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iDqT4-0002kr-0C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:39:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iDqT2-0003pf-PM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:39:29 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x241.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::241]:38546) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iDqT2-0003pP-Jr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:39:28 -0400 Received: by mail-oi1-x241.google.com with SMTP id m16so5224516oic.5 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 06:39:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=k1Q6bo6oGtzEZfTgCVarh8gJ3X7+oQ9djEhBLWXME+I=; b=VncKr+TLApkeE/Acoun7pM3F4Z/2uy+Iwh+NEKVbBuQgnSbpfPTN3oxWz6CAel/aVS 9zeBxPkiW7/Id0f3b/iXTL7Ln2AbaIb6XetkfFzZr5LuHOmFSpU/Jf6ZuycE+D6vkBtm nNVV2vaST1mONoOyT8Rrhbn2TenyHPVbc4u4mkI9Bu/nKrolmthYCVlMVVmPBltfnIwl YyxcIEBwaprdKHBaGBQskhGhP57lgwJNmd2CSm3nHPub174A+gOW4wRf+Z/xvEZ5ceNj IyBjsHhu9Q1xZxoHnUalckKou18/ha7qYu6PzIPrtCYkTXhJD9jc6tz1aH5dfgvrIaqv 3BgQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=k1Q6bo6oGtzEZfTgCVarh8gJ3X7+oQ9djEhBLWXME+I=; b=KJ4aKVQJlrA2BVgPVuvDP2y1BC58gW8t2V9aoxIU9VuvSgm+mEIcn9/GB7A0UKPzxi GKJqNmyI84jlBHbBFK6I/nzoTFbdLjDVcSoWTCg+Sfbof2wmb5mN3OCGoyqCNUK3/II9 cNI/La5xy2llreqjKPQbcEkgQSr34Q9HyTm6oaNYdtHa7HkPGC4PXcVntAwGOoRGINoA QHx1CiP1cJ/rnYdNKqC7y6gD2htj88oLQ1d/+M8+uHM6iFIn6khs7Ubw4e9zV5guWD1K D36GnMs6kA3OIsb7if5qyrMYY+7IwC5v1ewU7lrlopae5+zmfDxBaBK/DhsGsYKoePtd 2VFQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVg++ns2kR5jD1kze3TRf4e3sKs1yJ0dIZZzi0Z2QY5Dov9+Xvj mNYMvZfnC0tNzh+eodnNh5L2B66HZAxTBbA0amwhheDuub0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzl/r0A6XiasIObFSV9pVEPg672uJPNVlmJp4Xr7Yks8/WoPBa0Nl+0arNRufL8nrM1C9YEnUrS5xrO2QhYtM0= X-Received: by 2002:aca:f54d:: with SMTP id t74mr6688250oih.170.1569580670906; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 03:37:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190918130633.4872-1-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> <20190925112804-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20190925173753.7382593d@Igors-MacBook-Pro> <20190925122006-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20190925122006-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> From: Peter Maydell Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:37:39 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH-for-4.2 v11 00/11] ARM virt: ACPI memory hotplug support To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::241 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Samuel Ortiz , Eric Auger , Ard Biesheuvel , QEMU Developers , Shameer Kolothum , Linuxarm , Shannon Zhao , qemu-arm , Xu Wei , Igor Mammedov , sebastien.boeuf@intel.com, Laszlo Ersek Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 17:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 05:37:53PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:28:42 -0400 > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 02:06:22PM +0100, Shameer Kolothum wrote: > > > > This series is an attempt to provide device memory hotplug support > > > > on ARM virt platform. This is based on Eric's recent works here[1] > > > > and carries some of the pc-dimm related patches dropped from his > > > > series. > > > > > > > > The kernel support for arm64 memory hot add was added recently by > > > > Robin and hence the guest kernel should be => 5.0-rc1. > > > > > > > > NVDIM support is not included currently as we still have an unresolved > > > > issue while hot adding NVDIMM[2]. However NVDIMM cold plug patches > > > > can be included, but not done for now, for keeping it simple. > > > > > > > > This makes use of GED device to sent hotplug ACPI events to the > > > > Guest. GED code is based on Nemu. Thanks to the efforts of Samuel and > > > > Sebastien to add the hardware-reduced support to Nemu using GED > > > > device[3]. (Please shout if I got the author/signed-off wrong for > > > > those patches or missed any names). > > > > > > > > This is sanity tested on a HiSilicon ARM64 platform and appreciate > > > > any further testing. > > > > > > > > Note: > > > > Attempted adding dimm_pxm test case to bios-tables-test for arm/virt. > > > > But noticed the issue decribed here[5]. This is under investigation > > > > now. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Shameer > > > > > > > > > Which tree is this going through? Mine or ARM? > > > > I'd assume your tree??? > > (You are the wizard who knows how to handle bios-tables-test-allowed-diff.h on merge) > > Sure. Peter if you agree, could you send your ack for that please? Yeah, that's as good a way to do it as any. Acked-by: Peter Maydell thanks -- PMM