From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40717) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UbzGg-00036C-5j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 16:22:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UbzGb-0006cW-JS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 16:22:46 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::232]:53446) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UbzGb-0006cS-CH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 16:22:41 -0400 Received: by mail-la0-f50.google.com with SMTP id dz20so2737794lab.9 for ; Mon, 13 May 2013 13:22:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4f3e255de05cb2779760c6559aba4b8c2bb09634.1368474222.git.mst@redhat.com> References: <4f3e255de05cb2779760c6559aba4b8c2bb09634.1368474222.git.mst@redhat.com> From: Peter Maydell Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 21:22:20 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 01/13] apic: rename apic specific bitopts List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: seabios@seabios.org, lersek@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori On 13 May 2013 21:00, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > apic has its own version of bitops, with the > difference that it works on u32 and not long. > Add apic_ prefix to avoid namespace clashes. Wouldn't it be better to consolidate so we only have one set of bitops rather than a local set in this file? thanks -- PMM