From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Maydell Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 23/23] sev: add migration blocker Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 11:10:48 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20171206200346.116537-1-brijesh.singh@amd.com> <20171206200346.116537-24-brijesh.singh@amd.com> <20171207110342.GB2439@work-vm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: Brijesh Singh , QEMU Developers , Alistair Francis , Christian Borntraeger , Cornelia Huck , "Daniel P . Berrange" , "Edgar E . Iglesias" , Eduardo Habkost , Eric Blake , kvm-devel , Marcel Apfelbaum , Markus Armbruster , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Paolo Bonzini , Peter Crosthwaite , Richard Henderson , Richard Henderson , Stefan Hajnoczi , Thomas L To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Return-path: Received: from mail-oi0-f46.google.com ([209.85.218.46]:34262 "EHLO mail-oi0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752561AbdLGLLJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2017 06:11:09 -0500 Received: by mail-oi0-f46.google.com with SMTP id u193so4667508oie.1 for ; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 03:11:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20171207110342.GB2439@work-vm> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 7 December 2017 at 11:03, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > * Brijesh Singh (brijesh.singh@amd.com) wrote: >> SEV guest migration is not yet implemented yet. Is there at least a plan for how migration of a guest with encrypted memory would be implemented? thanks -- PMM From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37055) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eMu58-0005wG-HY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 06:11:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eMu57-0003T8-HO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 06:11:10 -0500 Received: from mail-oi0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22a]:34848) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eMu57-0003SL-CN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 06:11:09 -0500 Received: by mail-oi0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 184so4657616oii.2 for ; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 03:11:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171207110342.GB2439@work-vm> References: <20171206200346.116537-1-brijesh.singh@amd.com> <20171206200346.116537-24-brijesh.singh@amd.com> <20171207110342.GB2439@work-vm> From: Peter Maydell Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 11:10:48 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 23/23] sev: add migration blocker List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Cc: Brijesh Singh , QEMU Developers , Alistair Francis , Christian Borntraeger , Cornelia Huck , "Daniel P . Berrange" , "Edgar E . Iglesias" , Eduardo Habkost , Eric Blake , kvm-devel , Marcel Apfelbaum , Markus Armbruster , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Paolo Bonzini , Peter Crosthwaite , Richard Henderson , Richard Henderson , Stefan Hajnoczi , Thomas Lendacky , Borislav Petkov On 7 December 2017 at 11:03, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > * Brijesh Singh (brijesh.singh@amd.com) wrote: >> SEV guest migration is not yet implemented yet. Is there at least a plan for how migration of a guest with encrypted memory would be implemented? thanks -- PMM