From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39411) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YH9p4-0000Zm-OY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:33:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YH9oz-0006xb-UW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:33:14 -0500 Received: from mail-la0-f42.google.com ([209.85.215.42]:34368) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YH9oz-0006xR-Ng for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:33:09 -0500 Received: by mail-la0-f42.google.com with SMTP id ms9so23145333lab.1 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 03:33:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <54CA6CF6.7090308@redhat.com> <54CA7BF5.8020800@redhat.com> <54CA8637.2080306@redhat.com> <54CA8E37.8070009@redhat.com> <20150130095456.GB27572@redhat.com> <20150130104833.GC27572@redhat.com> From: Peter Maydell Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 11:32:48 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] address order of virtio-mmio devices List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Daniel P. Berrange" Cc: Laszlo Ersek , qemu devel list On 30 January 2015 at 10:54, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 30 January 2015 at 10:48, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> Long term though it will be much better of AArch64 would just do PCI >> instead of MMIO bus. Then we have proper device addressing which we >> can control in a predictable manner that will be stable across hotplug >> and unplug and migration. I hear there's work on PCI for AArch64 but >> is there a near term ETA yet ? > > I need to review Alex's v3 patchset; if it doesn't have any issues > it'll probably go into target-arm.next next week and hit mainline > shortly after that. Incidentally if you have opinions about sensible minimum sizes of PCI ECAM and MMIO windows in the address space now would be a good time to air them. -- PMM