From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57196)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1UHeWz-0001Uo-Fy
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:11:35 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1UHeWu-0000t2-Nz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:11:33 -0400
Received: from mail-lb0-f180.google.com ([209.85.217.180]:45870)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1UHeWu-0000sq-Gl
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:11:28 -0400
Received: by mail-lb0-f180.google.com with SMTP id q12so4787394lbc.25
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:11:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5147572E.8040501@redhat.com>
References: <1363628125-5310-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA8yVrVSBLer45F_2kwmxHeKEBnO3ux9foU80YgAWd3f9w@mail.gmail.com>
	<5147572E.8040501@redhat.com>
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:11:07 +0000
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA9PYeXnpr1Lykurgr64A1EL+zNod7us-2RZYCOBTxjGYg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/35] hw/ reorganization, part 2
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=C3=A4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>

On 18 March 2013 18:04, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> Il 18/03/2013 18:38, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
>> On 18 March 2013 17:34, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> >  hw/{ => arm}/a15mpcore.c                           |   0
>>> >  hw/{ => arm}/a9mpcore.c                            |   0
>>> >  hw/{ => arm}/arm11mpcore.c                         |   0
>> Still no.
>
> I pointed you to the list of hw/arm files I wrote the first time, where
> you okay-ed a*mpcore.c going in hw/arm, but you didn't answer with a
> better alternative...

No, I said they were single devices and shouldn't go in hw/arm.

> So what is the better alternative?  A new hw/container/?

Maybe. Whatever it is, it should be a classification by kind
of device, so we can consistently sort by kind of device
and not part by kind of device and part by target architecture.

Personally I have no issues with the existing 'all in hw/'
arrangement; I just want you to come up with a consistent
structure if you're going to try to change it.

-- PMM