From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186C5C433EF for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 14:44:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9760561107 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 14:44:49 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 9760561107 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:44596 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mSh0q-0003yI-Ho for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 10:44:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50550) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mSgzj-0002kc-8t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 10:43:39 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::435]:38711) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mSgzh-0000Uh-Ia for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 10:43:38 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id u18so38171476wrg.5 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 07:43:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=04ptVJz7VNZ1Xf+1i9Hwhf0Q+E6XQyPE/UXpj2UKZBk=; b=Yn8dvWSqONpuZoWW7Yqv+J2wekxAR3arHvSguehqGFcKcEBWorZNNgedu2XPLHB5Gk xmcv0P7zHeG9v/v6+xeLnv3pV6vLBNDdlHDaf3bdUK0gmwWr5XXAHqjuJAKPSzMmEeW4 NyD7Rl0+yiv4owzt94+NmFK3s8jNurXRYWQZwfZ+wzU+JYwwRTSlH134cCbGtTAV5+ys psA62zH+E4srHfXXm5R8e/Q17qTKahg2vKmWAJ/ylmiAGn+ia59tlJaUH96jLbiEUQJw 5IhCYHzCirkiqvsgt1SOfObVdsf4dQky1LUoa0nKWXISwZtvPQVRfiNlqtNr7sId6eug kXGA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=04ptVJz7VNZ1Xf+1i9Hwhf0Q+E6XQyPE/UXpj2UKZBk=; b=yfp5f8+sQHciO3dbtV7d4EOQ43U9IsFGmqp/TJFJMPYXAAGMwzDFnyCvOWrGYSp5DS s5G3fHfn8vJCiQqUDK8I6xnuv1XnDOoZne761KRYXC+rXUkhdhPl8iOptFsMq7vNqqaA eBt0XwBVTwg79MkNIjdhuyv31TVi5YGCGmPXJIDPQ3BP6jHjIU3AoL5p47OhO43775w8 RyKAFlW+T7zpSVJbCYOn/cJ+ohl7yS7/9j/PQ6ie7mJWI1p5MHqhMqFH31AogV+bh/ZI wbKiOV9tljG4YVL0WOvh5zHNZGYhErwXtPqlS/PWGqmv3gyBEWfwz5nH6G9JSnKYCOLH EBzg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530oZSdybp1G53+92hIRYBK9e5C3Kt9uPNIRiiH/qvUB19vRJvLO woozFjonf1lOohBmQbXjyUlRQZCX4bS3kyyab1TGPg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwImOgJW8yWrjJ0DiemJWNb2FJhDZfz6g05/ziFTZCLXSs2CYyIQKZcHeJG32qdFkxEXHGU/cs8gWvYtERuSGc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2259:: with SMTP id a25mr5112590wmm.133.1632235414761; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 07:43:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210920080451.408655-1-git@xen0n.name> <20210920080451.408655-29-git@xen0n.name> In-Reply-To: From: Peter Maydell Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 15:42:42 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 28/30] configure, meson.build: Mark support for 64-bit LoongArch hosts To: Richard Henderson Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::435; envelope-from=peter.maydell@linaro.org; helo=mail-wr1-x435.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: WANG Xuerui , QEMU Developers Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Mon, 20 Sept 2021 at 18:25, Richard Henderson wrote: > > On 9/20/21 1:04 AM, WANG Xuerui wrote: > > Signed-off-by: WANG Xuerui > Be consistent with loongarch or loongarch64 everywhere. > > If there's no loongarch32, and never will be, then there's probably no point in keeping > the '64' suffix. What does Linux 'uname -m' call the architecture, and what is the name in the gcc triplet? Generally I think we should prefer to follow those precedents (which hopefully don't point in different directions) rather than making up our own architecture names. thanks -- PMM