From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34328) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwFn3-0001Ww-FG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:49:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwFn2-0000p0-Mc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:49:49 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22e]:35942) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwFn2-0000nl-Hp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:49:48 -0400 Received: by mail-vk0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 2so194690183vkb.3 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:49:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161017212431.29726.22702@loki> References: <1476335734-29831-1-git-send-email-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> <20161013222835.GP18039@umbus.fritz.box> <20161014102759.566a1c5e@bahia> <20161017165126.7445.53992@loki> <20161017181348.29726.67454@loki> <20161017212431.29726.22702@loki> From: Peter Maydell Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 22:49:27 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-stable] [Qemu-ppc] [PULL 0/4] ppc patches for qemu-2.7 stable branch List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Roth Cc: Thomas Huth , Greg Kurz , David Gibson , "qemu-ppc@nongnu.org" , qemu-stable , QEMU Developers On 17 October 2016 at 22:24, Michael Roth wrote: > Quoting Peter Maydell (2016-10-17 13:45:21) >> On 17 October 2016 at 19:13, Michael Roth wrote: >> > We could do both though: use some ad-hoc way to tag for a particular >> > sub-maintainer tree/stable branch, as well as an explicit "not for >> > master" in the cover letter ensure it doesn't go into master. It's a bit >> > more redundant, but flexible in that people can use whatever tagging >> > format they want for a particular tree. >> >> Yes, that would be my preference. Gmail's filtering is not >> very good, and it doesn't seem to be able to support >> multiple or complex matches on the subject line, but >> it can deal with "doesn't include foo in body". >> People who actively want to look for stuff not to go >> into master can filter it however they like. > > Sounds good to me. For my part I think "for-2.7.1" etc. would be > prefereable. No need to resend this patchset though. > > I suppose MAINTAINERS would be the best place to document something > like this? We have http://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPullRequest and I've added a note to it. thanks -- PMM