From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39499) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEpAL-0002zF-SY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 20:05:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEpAI-0005xq-Ln for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 20:05:33 -0500 Received: from mail-lb0-f170.google.com ([209.85.217.170]:50630) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEpAI-0005xe-8M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 20:05:30 -0500 Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w7so420792lbi.1 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 17:05:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1422037228-5363-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <1422037228-5363-2-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> From: Peter Maydell Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 01:05:08 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/11] cpu_ldst.h: Allow NB_MMU_MODES to be 7 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Greg Bellows Cc: "Edgar E. Iglesias" , Andrew Jones , =?UTF-8?B?QWxleCBCZW5uw6ll?= , QEMU Developers , Patch Tracking On 23 January 2015 at 20:16, Greg Bellows wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Peter Maydell > wrote: >> Support guest CPUs which need 7 MMU index values. >> Add a comment about what would be required to raise the limit >> further (trivial for 8, TCG backend rework for 9 or more). >> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell >> --- >> include/exec/cpu_ldst.h | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--- >> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/exec/cpu_ldst.h b/include/exec/cpu_ldst.h >> index 0e825ea..fa5ea63 100644 >> --- a/include/exec/cpu_ldst.h >> +++ b/include/exec/cpu_ldst.h >> @@ -244,9 +244,31 @@ uint64_t helper_ldq_cmmu(CPUArchState *env, target_ulong addr, int mmu_idx); >> #undef MEMSUFFIX >> #endif /* (NB_MMU_MODES >= 6) */ >> >> -#if (NB_MMU_MODES > 6) >> -#error "NB_MMU_MODES > 6 is not supported for now" >> -#endif /* (NB_MMU_MODES > 6) */ >> +#if (NB_MMU_MODES >= 7) && defined(MMU_MODE6_SUFFIX) >> + >> +#define CPU_MMU_INDEX 6 >> +#define MEMSUFFIX MMU_MODE5_SUFFIX > > Should this be MMU_MODE6_SUFFIX? Yes, good catch (we don't notice since we don't define the MMU_MODE*_SUFFIX anyway). -- PMM