From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56520) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqj25-0007HG-07 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 12:27:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqj24-00076V-4T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 12:27:17 -0500 Received: from mail-ot0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::233]:44721) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqj23-00076I-V1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 12:27:16 -0500 Received: by mail-ot0-x233.google.com with SMTP id 79so4493078oth.11 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:27:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180227104903.21353-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org> References: <20180227104903.21353-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org> From: Peter Maydell Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 17:26:54 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Versatile Express SiI9022 emulation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Linus Walleij Cc: QEMU Developers , qemu-arm , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu=2DDaud=C3=A9?= , Corey Minyard On 27 February 2018 at 10:48, Linus Walleij wrote: > This series adds proper display bridge/connector emulation > for the Versatile Express, implementing a simple Silicon > Image 9022 emulation spawning a DDC I2C child. > > After the series the Versatile Express is successfully > presented the "QEMU monitor" through DDC I2C. > > The series includes two refactorings from Corey and a > minor bug fix for the i2c-ddc so that everything is smoothly > integrated. > > Corey Minyard (2): > i2c: Fix some brace style issues > i2c: Move the bus class to i2c.h > > Linus Walleij (3): > hw/i2c-ddc: Do not fail writes > hw/sii9022: Add support for Silicon Image SII9022 > arm/vexpress: Add proper display connector emulation Hi; I've applied this to target-arm.next with the tweak to the commit message of patch 5 and the reset function in patch 4. Let me know if you think those are wrong or you'd prefer to respin the series yourself. thanks -- PMM