From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33175) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJNgm-00037c-7m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 09:45:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJNgf-00014g-Sq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 09:45:51 -0500 Received: from mail-lb0-f171.google.com ([209.85.217.171]:61487) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJNgf-000146-M3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 09:45:45 -0500 Received: by mail-lb0-f171.google.com with SMTP id u14so7867521lbd.2 for ; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 06:45:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150205143836.GI19277@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> References: <20150204113229.GN3032@redhat.com> <54D213E0.8090408@redhat.com> <20150204130041.GQ3032@redhat.com> <54D221BC.50008@redhat.com> <20150205143836.GI19277@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> From: Peter Maydell Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 14:45:23 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: Universal encryption on QEMU I/O channels List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Paolo Bonzini , QEMU Developers On 5 February 2015 at 14:38, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > Yes, the glib 2.12 requirement is too conservative. We can definitely > move to a higher version. > > Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.6 is on 2.28. > Debian wheezy (stable) is on glib 2.33. I'd rather not drop support for Debian oldstable or Ubuntu LTS distros, though, so 2.24 (or 2.22 if you want to maintain support for fink on OSX). -- PMM