All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: "Emilio G. Cota" <cota@braap.org>,
	"Richard Henderson" <rth@twiddle.net>,
	"Laurent Vivier" <laurent@vivier.eu>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Alex Benn�e" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Benchmarking linux-user performance
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:48:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA9s0tHLYFwm+SP22ecB9uw1oyXdJSf5iG0iKzwRQuoGpQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170310114531.GB2480@work-vm>

On 10 March 2017 at 12:45, Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> wrote:
> * Emilio G. Cota (cota@braap.org) wrote:
>>                      x86_64 NBench Floating Point Performance
>>                   Host: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 0 @ 2.90GHz
>>
>>   1.88 +-+-+---+--+---+---+---+--+---+---+---+---+--+---+---+---+--+---+-+-+
>>        |   +   +  +  *A*#*A*  +  +   +   +   +   +  +   +   +   +  +   +   |
>>   1.86 +-+           *** ***                                             +-+
>>        |            #       #   *A*#***                                    |
>>        |      *A*# #         # ##   *A*                                    |
>>   1.84 +-+    #  *A*         *A*      #                                  +-+
>>        |      #                        #                              *A*  |
>>   1.82 +-+   #                          #                            ##  +-+
>>        |     #                          *A*#                        #      |
>>    1.8 +-+  #                               #  #*A*               *A*    +-+
>>        |    #                               *A*   #                #       |
>>   1.78 +-+*A*                                      #       *A*    #      +-+
>>        |                                           #   ***#  #    #        |
>>        |                                           *A*#*A*    #  #         |
>>   1.76 +-+                                         ***         # #       +-+
>>        |   +   +  +   +   +   +  +   +   +   +   +  +   +   +  *A* +   +   |
>>   1.74 +-+-+---+--+---+---+---+--+---+---+---+---+--+---+---+---+--+---+-+-+
>>          v1.v1.v1.2v1.3v1.4v1.v1.6v1.7v2.0v2.1v2.v2.3v2.4v2.5v2.v2.7v2.8.0
>>                                    QEMU version
>
> I'm assuming the dips are where QEMU fixed something and cared about corner
> cases/accuracy?

Given the scale on the LHS is from 1.74 to 1.88 my guess is that the
variation is in large part noise and the major thing is "our fp
performance is bounded by softfloat, which doesn't change and is
always very slow".

thanks
-- PMM

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-10 11:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-10  1:23 [Qemu-devel] Benchmarking linux-user performance Emilio G. Cota
2017-03-10 11:45 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-03-10 11:48   ` Peter Maydell [this message]
2017-03-11  2:25     ` Emilio G. Cota
2017-03-11 15:02       ` Peter Maydell
2017-03-11  2:18   ` Emilio G. Cota
2017-03-14 17:06     ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-03-16 17:13       ` Emilio G. Cota

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFEAcA9s0tHLYFwm+SP22ecB9uw1oyXdJSf5iG0iKzwRQuoGpQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=cota@braap.org \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=laurent@vivier.eu \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.