From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F76C433FE for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 19:57:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABA7C22955 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 19:57:44 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org ABA7C22955 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:42488 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klHD4-0004fz-UA for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 14:57:42 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34494) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klEa8-0006wJ-Bj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 12:09:22 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x144.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::144]:35214) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klEZI-00067E-7I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 12:08:56 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-x144.google.com with SMTP id a9so8632993lfh.2 for ; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 09:07:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=x21ViHKE8gzgFzcgovKz4qGIY6AqAc/2iDUN+mzcJws=; b=DrBXTq9iwPhBhcNIaejzmU86137Wg4cLvB/g9whh+Z/PphkZKx7QGLap0poB2ujEpa 6C172x1qUWqPj/se9kOxjbMUGQDbR7yal3wGrdBSwsgL0xVMtY5X4FqNtHGYHixbAeNh A+a1zb24pTsg8pq5lKXIW5jaeQ5npqz5HZdyls24sSr7JTt3sQ74jddBXJfYow9sgQKr 2iukEVyhHNvoClATLLR0ujPfCUy0rPdiBhDS/jjytj1VJoCRS0ieeymvpA9eOP5V9uKD 7MH/Dg8C7mARrz42Dx7hyfft+tCZRFlsvprbzQr6Slu4yZU4S28jqGTSYy4HtbpQIWDB xz9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=x21ViHKE8gzgFzcgovKz4qGIY6AqAc/2iDUN+mzcJws=; b=A2FtZ9HNVUoIusHAyxiTIRU68/qsfyp9APTMRn3f6VSMudLlFTPBYrzMFefHb7D3oz ZkMxYqVBCRYpEz6VEli1YqXvGobkfEalX9K0eB02e1H8aq+5xf4h8Ep9mEYHOiNNruwj KZMuAigGy+iWhhmQIbw3bOEoxuzlVObxKr/6wbe8do59n+xSCtDml24RW1pWkISjpG2D VurIvUvWvPnfKkrVSspaPk1BcgdEh+qLAJ2kXgyS1l+SwUwMJSLWWujIQ4kDar6Cac/Q +s9GDMWjIx+/d2F5LDEknXgJw6itlxLTvQFKjHvhqat2MjvBmSHgn0cpxO+RnXB5fV0m 8mYg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531UCr1SdfvoRlNWWZ+CWnIhaLExpNDCgi1fHjAF7xzb7sJYAXCJ VnVOUDtmcAWapcU8RzxOLi14nXE07vTNRl0nFfEt2yDd+BY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz+tC/89xYumgdKnNFdNxHibFC9yljQYbjwId0WBLXEEbHf4qa4DbdIQ/RzbWhZK/hMN2MDxRTJzH6A+evc/aI= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:cdc3:: with SMTP id h3mr2146422edw.52.1607099783375; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 08:36:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201125040642.2339476-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org> <56701347-e0a0-ae47-8bba-f5cdff253475@redhat.com> <3d6d46d8-04bc-7ad8-d71e-4ce15a6e7e47@ispras.ru> <3ab6b7fb-51cf-0ec4-2c70-e86bb01dcc3f@ispras.ru> In-Reply-To: <3ab6b7fb-51cf-0ec4-2c70-e86bb01dcc3f@ispras.ru> From: Peter Maydell Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 16:36:12 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH for-6.0 00/11] target/arm: enforce alignment To: Pavel Dovgalyuk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::144; envelope-from=peter.maydell@linaro.org; helo=mail-lf1-x144.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Richard Henderson , qemu-arm , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu=2DDaud=C3=A9?= , QEMU Developers Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 06:17, Pavel Dovgalyuk wr= ote: > > On 03.12.2020 19:14, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 16:10, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote: > >> > >> On 03.12.2020 15:30, Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 wrote: > >>> Cc'ing Pavel > >>> > >>> On 12/1/20 4:55 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > >>>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 04:06, Richard Henderson > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> As reported in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905356 > >>>>> > >>>>> Not implementing SCTLR.A, but all of the other required > >>>>> alignment for SCTLR.A=3D0 in Table A3-1. > >>>> > >>>> Something in this series breaks the 'make check-acceptance' > >>>> record-and-replay test: > >>>> > >>>> (30/40) tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py:ReplayKernelNormal.test= _aarch64_virt: > >>>> PASS (9.14 s) > >>>> (31/40) tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py:ReplayKernelNormal.test= _arm_virt: > >>>> INTERRUPTED: Test interrupted by SIGTERM\nRunner error occurred: > >>>> Timeout reached\nOriginal status: ERROR\n{'name': > >>>> '31-tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py:ReplayKernelNormal.test_arm_vi= rt', > >>>> 'logdir': '/home/petmay01/linaro/qemu-from-laptop/qemu/build/arm-cla= ng/tests/result... > >>>> (90.19 s) > >>>> > >>>> The log shows the "recording execution" apparently hanging, > >>>> with the last output from the guest > >>>> [ 3.183662] Registering SWP/SWPB emulation handler > >> > >> I looked through the patches and it does not seem that they can break > >> anything. > >> Could it be the same avocado/chardev socket glitch as in some previous > >> failures? > >> What happens when re-running this test? > > > > I ran it a couple of times with the patchset and it failed the same > > way each time. Without is fine. > > I applied the patches and got no failures on my local machine. > > Do you have any ideas on debugging this bug? > What does "arm-clang" means? Is the host compiler is clang? Yes, it's a clang build (with the sanitizers enabled, though I didn't see any output from the sanitizers in the logfile). thanks -- PMM