From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57394) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bn4ZY-0006Hh-E7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:02:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bn4ZS-0005mb-Kn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:01:55 -0400 Received: from mail-ua0-x232.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c08::232]:35006) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bn4ZS-0005mX-GM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:01:50 -0400 Received: by mail-ua0-x232.google.com with SMTP id 107so635164uah.2 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 07:01:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87vaxojgqw.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> References: <877fa5aiu4.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <6373e011-5068-b0ae-5672-e3704af556d9@redhat.com> <87h998nvf6.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <6280ba63-cbe9-c2d3-ba8f-7de1369f059e@redhat.com> <87vaxojgqw.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> From: Peter Maydell Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 15:01:29 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 0/8] Add a generic loader List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Peter Crosthwaite , Christopher Covington , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" , Alistair Francis On 22 September 2016 at 12:50, Markus Armbruster wrote: > However, in the case we're discussing, we're not doing that! There is > no RAM device with a trivial backend folded in. There's only a weird > pseudo-device that copies the contents of a file into memory, then sits > around doing absolutely nothing. It doesn't sit around doing entirely nothing, it sits around so that when the machine is reset it can do the copying again... In any case, I'm going to drop patches 7 and 8 from target-arm.next for the moment so we can come to a consensus about whether this should be -device or -object (and possibly respin the patch to use -object if we decide that; hopefully it should be simple...) I'll keep patches 1..6 in. thanks -- PMM