From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44273) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ffAL9-0006i3-D6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 16:43:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ffAL8-0001WZ-Nj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 16:43:27 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234]:38956) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ffAL8-0001Vb-I5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 16:43:26 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-x234.google.com with SMTP id d189-v6so77359810oib.6 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 13:43:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20180716025346.GF2599@umbus.fritz.box> From: Peter Maydell Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 21:43:05 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] hw/display/sm501* status List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: BALATON Zoltan Cc: David Gibson , Magnus Damm , Aurelien Jarno , Gerd Hoffmann , Sebastian Bauer , QEMU Developers On 16 July 2018 at 21:26, BALATON Zoltan wrote: > I could list sm501 in the sam460ex section thus formally taking > sub-maintainership but this would only go as far that I'll get cc-d on > changes and try to review them. I still can't (and don't want to) maintain > my own tree and send pull requests directly so I'd need someone's help with > that who can take my patches and merge them via their tree. If it's OK to > continue to use the PPC tree for that I'm fine with that if David agrees > (which I think he did above). > > So is it OK to add sm501 to sam460ex section so I claim responsibility for > changes and will continue sending patches cc-ing David (and maybe Gerd to > help spotting problems) then David could take these via the PPC tree? I think that makes sense. sh4 is pretty dead and if sm501's major active user is the sam460ex then listing it there seems reasonable. thanks -- PMM