From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44536) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1evod7-0004Z1-S9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:26:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1evod7-0006sr-4Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:26:33 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-x241.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::241]:41975) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1evod6-0006sX-V7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:26:33 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-x241.google.com with SMTP id g5so508321oiy.8 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:26:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180313182343.GF3784@redhat.com> References: <20180312201305.16972-1-berrange@redhat.com> <20180313162708.GB3784@redhat.com> <20180313182343.GF3784@redhat.com> From: Peter Maydell Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:26:11 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/9] Socket next patches List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= Cc: Markus Armbruster , QEMU Developers , Gerd Hoffmann , =?UTF-8?B?TWFyYy1BbmRyw6kgTHVyZWF1?= , Paolo Bonzini On 13 March 2018 at 18:23, Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 wr= ote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 04:27:08PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 wrote: >> This feels unrelated to the series, so possibly a non-deterministic >> failure > > Looking at the test source code, it has a 60 second wait for the > emulator to print expected data on the serial port. My guess > would be that when running with a highly parallel make check > we're sometimes exceeding that 60 seconds. I don't see a > reason why my series would have affected this in a way that > only failed with sparc64 qtest, and none others. Sounds plausible. Feel free to resubmit the pullreq with the actual bug fixed, for another spin of the intermittent-failure roulette wheel :-) -- PMM