From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3904FC433EF for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:45:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42650 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nJYrJ-0001bu-2k for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 05:45:29 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47860) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nJYpf-0008S9-NP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 05:43:47 -0500 Received: from [2a00:1450:4864:20::432] (port=40958 helo=mail-wr1-x432.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nJYpd-0001L2-Fb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 05:43:47 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id j26so15232150wrb.7 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 02:43:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fAwQVllNV5REZ4fzUCZkGXQqHEDF3X80TRKMBRFFhW8=; b=jeMJhL8P1X74MCOHJutC+SJKEG6Q1pCWtJyPj1zkIRR/dbRwRZLxUInT0wx8X6tTyC QgOXzstGHIglNAGGqtETq6wCnv4HJsqB9SyiTeUGGFlTdCdDPWpNL//Kcmy6eCmzTHcx BSE8mimSawPUz8/7Is+46jG3BOY17fPUSuygw/UjR0CDEVjpEG/lDLGf/7dvOT8wXJ4N lzG3qlJn8AR1A2m8+lF93zSlH6egB4ioK9QGVVGHOHdON7LImC/yg8FqibGMxJdcfFul wcMRkQrG9D7eb0dsextSWktjb/WX5WPdZxFUHlz7mjjdMrJb0CSyjv5bWJ3mewE+2x+G KcxQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fAwQVllNV5REZ4fzUCZkGXQqHEDF3X80TRKMBRFFhW8=; b=A8hQe1yWjIHdTKrcuhWeifC/eXPkapfAIICMZXXnjZU4S8x5Xos20UzF09mveKo4C/ t+j/Rcx8bL5ciVCu96oXF3k7hfgfFHzhHDyFgfTdZb7xTJBqTz6AjFpU2KHP16GLwWZa s9UY9q4505pNbvixY5VBR8MvtANVq2pdtlXZkSu7q72oI08tVAnAAWPibDSKvdyj3HGQ dJa9Qc6F5KuIbfYbcppN27Jz2RVWigVpv7q6rjJujASK1uPuFJDwgEEIdY3CaKlkrs0L NFgqI6GlXGdp2ddLlhRn50ATlU3bkjHGPM+aBP1fYkBm//+si6kccU8aLTv4N9rWzyp1 QqTw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531n7ODUw53nDny7M0pMlagtp/v1Wq8YkwmMVGMfwodftTLU38aL ZrTsirx8ADOtOtXK/hbOlT51wahNBaXNNwEfIuhS6Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxLbNQXtIyZKEy26GQ41q8HYv/Zsw0O1lqxjqvI8pRHB6NFOGhOKINAPpD6Jf0DE2g9qwuMYzu0+qMdyqhPN6o= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4ac7:: with SMTP id y7mr11041703wrs.521.1644835423344; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 02:43:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210616141910.54188-1-akihiko.odaki@gmail.com> <20220214102704.fjnb4v55l6tcjajk@sirius.home.kraxel.org> In-Reply-To: <20220214102704.fjnb4v55l6tcjajk@sirius.home.kraxel.org> From: Peter Maydell Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:43:32 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] ui/cocoa: Set UI information To: Gerd Hoffmann Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a00:1450:4864:20::432 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::432; envelope-from=peter.maydell@linaro.org; helo=mail-wr1-x432.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -4 X-Spam_score: -0.5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.785, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Akihiko Odaki Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 at 10:27, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > > (2) A question for Gerd: > > Is it safe to call dpy_set_ui_info() from a non-QEMU-main-thread? > > No. Is it OK to do so if the other thread is holding the iothread lock? (This is how we do a lot of the other "need to call a QEMU function" work from the cocoa UI thread.) thanks -- PMM