From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49504) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9D87-0004Mb-CQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 08:28:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9D83-0008TN-DR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 08:28:03 -0500 Received: from mail-lb0-f173.google.com ([209.85.217.173]:57827) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9D83-0008TH-6s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 08:27:59 -0500 Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id z12so2833827lbi.4 for ; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 05:27:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1420550957-22337-1-git-send-email-marcel@redhat.com> References: <1420550957-22337-1-git-send-email-marcel@redhat.com> From: Peter Maydell Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 13:27:38 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] simplify usb enabling logic and fix a Qemu crash List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Marcel Apfelbaum Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Laszlo Ersek , Alexander Graf , QEMU Developers , Stefan Hajnoczi , Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=C3=A4rber?= , Richard Henderson On 6 January 2015 at 13:29, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote: > Patch e79d5a6 ("machine: remove qemu_machine_opts global list") removed option > descriptions from the -machine QemuOptsList to avoid repeating MachineState's QOM properties. > > This resulted in a Qemu crash: > $ qemu-system-x86_64 -usb > qemu-system-x86_64: util/qemu-option.c:387: qemu_opt_get_bool_helper: > Assertion `opt->desc && opt->desc->type == QEMU_OPT_BOOL' failed. > Aborted (core dumped) > Based on the comments I will receive, I will continue to fix the options > properties in the same way. So does this mean that we still have other broken options? Do we have a timescale for fixing them? I was hoping to be able to commit a patchset fixing these regressions this week; if we can't do that then we should probably revert the original changes instead :-( -- PMM