From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FBA6200B9 for ; Fri, 4 May 2018 13:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751114AbeEDNc2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2018 09:32:28 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f41.google.com ([209.85.218.41]:42786 "EHLO mail-oi0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750820AbeEDNc1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2018 09:32:27 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f41.google.com with SMTP id t27-v6so19122768oij.9 for ; Fri, 04 May 2018 06:32:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XuS1wuSMG8MHgNMx962JwOCpmj8YrUwfQErScqlP4bI=; b=O0EofacOVAHFJZr0dNpAQHUTwLCoJ3Eay9nv/2ixcW2HqUeWp4MDe4umVFa7lpBmmT Ep4DEGE9zyJG7/4ADnSrjCkbaHzitM37MmtnG9KC/4obtS2/D/3z3LNMJC8Ph+IJTtZP SoEYHdv1IRAm9l3eRrmLNo2cejjy1fs+osI2Q= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XuS1wuSMG8MHgNMx962JwOCpmj8YrUwfQErScqlP4bI=; b=mJNdkZg8wd7IA02xacTSA6IWWc6qdxXDyyZ5v4ZrzyHOBeZ4I9KGt56LkiMavM+Lxm m1Fv3LUVuUO2xW/FlKeQx1Dzn3wiwYRHxDlmukEpdQ8GAvf7ZnzuJyxynqeBtApNyiGf HUlJOfYlWAmf0rPZQVXVM2qjFDwfogengsTkeCkNdxiT6wlY95McJbiNJPgDYiB/siI8 FGFY0mF0KOCahJkKUii9n62/4gknIT7iLC49EUbOgSEhY4VxwCain7zAZnQgYtCZlqxZ LzmNnTzTvj4DR9VWl6JlAXr/Lms78dv2Jak5aomqn3h00CmLwRaKJncMCOhjR0SvH/V5 TaTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tAP4mAgtIFtez6ymS/rpEK0JnsT50Hv4690zV8y7bLWbi5Bhi7r Zmc8g3ISe/EYrNEnlFyvHi/RXozrJWa55RrAodePww== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpi2XMDueCu9gHi6UR4tkb9ZHlaHORGU9SiKarH7bWwxbE2W49RsiTJsmddmBvs/gO4YHQlHp6e+yFL1LHgCIE= X-Received: by 2002:aca:4ac7:: with SMTP id x190-v6mr15648593oia.11.1525440746880; Fri, 04 May 2018 06:32:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a9d:40fb:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 4 May 2018 06:32:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20180504152658.3537707a.cohuck@redhat.com> References: <1525376963-79623-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <1525376963-79623-61-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20180504091007.55405a6a.cohuck@redhat.com> <20180504152658.3537707a.cohuck@redhat.com> From: Peter Maydell Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 14:32:06 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: cover letter cc's [was: [PATCH 60/67] hw/s390x: add include directory headers] To: Cornelia Huck Cc: Eric Blake , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , QEMU Developers , "Daniel P. Berrange" , Kevin Wolf , Christian Borntraeger , Alexander Graf , qemu-s390x , git@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 4 May 2018 at 14:26, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Fri, 4 May 2018 08:07:53 -0500 > Eric Blake wrote: >> On the other hand, cc'ing all recipients for a largely mechanical patch >> series that was split into 67 parts, in part because it touches so many >> different maintainers' areas, may make the cover letter have so many >> recipients that various mail gateways start rejecting it as potential spam. > > Yes, large cross-subsystem patch series make this painful. My solution is to either (a) avoid them or (b) not bother cc'ing people (except people I think might be interested in reviewing cross-subsystem patchsets like Eric ;-))... thanks -- PMM From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44839) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fEap6-0008Cd-N1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2018 09:32:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fEap1-0004uu-TN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2018 09:32:32 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22d]:33968) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fEap1-0004uL-Oc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2018 09:32:27 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id l1-v6so19133294oii.1 for ; Fri, 04 May 2018 06:32:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180504152658.3537707a.cohuck@redhat.com> References: <1525376963-79623-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <1525376963-79623-61-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20180504091007.55405a6a.cohuck@redhat.com> <20180504152658.3537707a.cohuck@redhat.com> From: Peter Maydell Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 14:32:06 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] cover letter cc's [was: [PATCH 60/67] hw/s390x: add include directory headers] List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Cornelia Huck Cc: Eric Blake , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , QEMU Developers , "Daniel P. Berrange" , Kevin Wolf , Christian Borntraeger , Alexander Graf , qemu-s390x , git@vger.kernel.org On 4 May 2018 at 14:26, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Fri, 4 May 2018 08:07:53 -0500 > Eric Blake wrote: >> On the other hand, cc'ing all recipients for a largely mechanical patch >> series that was split into 67 parts, in part because it touches so many >> different maintainers' areas, may make the cover letter have so many >> recipients that various mail gateways start rejecting it as potential spam. > > Yes, large cross-subsystem patch series make this painful. My solution is to either (a) avoid them or (b) not bother cc'ing people (except people I think might be interested in reviewing cross-subsystem patchsets like Eric ;-))... thanks -- PMM