On 06.07.2023 18:08, Simone Ballarin wrote:
> Il giorno gio 6 lug 2023 alle ore 10:26 Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> ha
> scritto:
>
>> On 05.07.2023 17:26, Simone Ballarin wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/apic.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/apic.c
>>> @@ -1211,7 +1211,7 @@ static void __init calibrate_APIC_clock(void)
>>>       * Setup the APIC counter to maximum. There is no way the lapic
>>>       * can underflow in the 100ms detection time frame.
>>>       */
>>> -    __setup_APIC_LVTT(0xffffffff);
>>> +    __setup_APIC_LVTT(0xffffffffU);
>>
>> While making the change less mechanical, we want to consider to switch
>> to ~0 in this and similar cases.
>>
>
> Changing ~0U is more than not mechanical: it is possibly dangerous.
> The resulting value could be different depending on the architecture,
> I prefer to not make such kind of changes in a MISRA-related patch.

What do you mean by "depending on the architecture", when this is
x86-only code _and_ you can check what type parameter the called
function has?

Jan