From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] credit1: replace cpumask_empty() uses Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 12:50:35 +0100 Message-ID: References: <5217309002000078000EDE7D@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <5217316902000078000EDE94@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VCpt0-0005T8-Fl for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 11:50:38 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id k13so431070wgh.1 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 04:50:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5217316902000078000EDE94@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: xen-devel , Keir Fraser List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > In one case it was redundant with the operation it got combined with, > and in the other it could easily be replaced by range checking the > result of a subsequent operation. (When running on big systems, > operations on CPU masks aren't cheap enough to use them carelessly.) > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Reviewed-by: George Dunlap