From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [V10 PATCH 19/23] PVH xen: vmcs related changes Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 14:39:19 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1374631171-15224-1-git-send-email-mukesh.rathor@oracle.com> <1374631171-15224-20-git-send-email-mukesh.rathor@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1374631171-15224-20-git-send-email-mukesh.rathor@oracle.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Mukesh Rathor Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "keir.xen@gmail.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Mukesh Rathor wrote: > > + /* 3. Secondary Processor-based controls (Intel SDM: resvd bits are 0): */ > + v->arch.hvm_vmx.secondary_exec_control = SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_EPT; > + v->arch.hvm_vmx.secondary_exec_control |= SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_VPID; In construct_vmcs(), it says, "Disable VPID for now; we decide when to enable it on VMENTER". Is this different somehow for PVH guests compared to HVM guests? -George