From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754773Ab2DTOGI (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:06:08 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com ([209.85.217.174]:45076 "EHLO mail-lb0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751433Ab2DTOGG (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:06:06 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120420122120.097464672@linutronix.de> References: <20120420122120.097464672@linutronix.de> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 16:06:04 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch 00/18] SMP: Boot and CPU hotplug refactoring - Part 1 From: richard -rw- weinberger To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: LKML , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Rusty Russell , "Paul E. McKenney" , Ingo Molnar , "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > This converts all architectures except m32r, mn10300, tile and UM to > the new core facility. These architecture are calling fork_idle() in > the very early boot code in smp_prepare_cpus() for unknown reasons. > I haven't analyzed yet, whether this is on purpose or can be moved > over to the generic facility. It'd be nice if the responsible maintainers > could look into that as well. SMP is marked as broken on UM, so I don't have any objections. :-) -- Thanks, //richard