All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Packham <judge.packham@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] relocation problem on powerpc
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 11:07:51 +1200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFOYHZCJbx4FTOZLr90z6PjuepZyfS0h2X1Rc_z8+TJ+_+0DBg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF9BF5CDB1.3298DC43-ONC1257D4D.0040A0D5-C1257D4D.0043F2B6@transmode.se>

Hi Jocke,

On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Joakim Tjernlund
<joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > There are some disadvantages to living in a weird timezone, mostly
>> > that you end up having conversations with yourself.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Chris Packham
> <judge.packham@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > Hi All,
>> > >
>> > > I have come across what I think is a relocation problem for powerpc.
>> > >
>> > > I've added the following to ArpTimeoutCheck
>> > >
>> > > +       printf("NetArpWaitTimerStart = %ld\n",
> NetArpWaitTimerStart);
>> > > +       printf("&NetArpWaitTimerStart = %p\n",
> &NetArpWaitTimerStart);
>> > > +       printf("NetArpWaitTry = %d\n", NetArpWaitTry);
>> > > +       printf("&NetArpWaitTry = %p\n", &NetArpWaitTry);
>> > > +       printf("NetArpWaitTxPacketSize = %d\n",
>> NetArpWaitTxPacketSize);
>> > > +       printf("&NetArpWaitTxPacketSize = %p\n",
>> &NetArpWaitTxPacketSize);
>> > >
>> > > Which yields the following output
>> > >
>> > >   NetArpWaitTimerStart = 0
>> > >   &NetArpWaitTimerStart = f00000d0
>> > >   NetArpWaitTry = 1
>> > >   &NetArpWaitTry = 7ffb0058
>> > >   NetArpWaitTxPacketSize = 42
>> > >   &NetArpWaitTxPacketSize = 7ffb0078
>> > >
>> > > That looks to me like NetArpWaitTimerStart hasn't been relocated for
>> > > some reason. Looking at my u-boot.map NetArpWaitTimerStart is the
> last
>> > > item in the .sbss section
>> > >
>> > > Here's the relevant snippets for the variables I'm displaying
>> > >
>> > >  0x00000000f0000058                NetArpWaitTry
>> > >  0x00000000f0000078                NetArpWaitTxPacketSize
>> > >  0x00000000f00000d0                NetArpWaitTimerStart
>> > >
>> > > The actual problem for me is that ARPs timeout and various network
>> > > things fail. Has anyone got any clues as to why this one particular
>> > > variable isn't getting relocated.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Chris
>> > >
>> > > More info:
>> > >   I'm building P2041RDB_config
>> > >
>> > >   $ git describe
>> > >   v2014.10-rc2-15-g2ec8915
>> > >
>> > >   => version
>> > >   U-Boot 2014.10-rc2-00015-g2ec8915-dirty (Sep 08 2014 - 16:18:42)
>> > >   powerpc-e500-linux-gnu-gcc (Gentoo 4.6.3-r1 p1.9, pie-0.5.2) 4.6.3
>> > >   GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.21
>> >
>> > I'm not confident enough to say it's a fix but the following seems to
>> > solve the relocation problem for NetArpWaitTimerStart.
>> >
>> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/u-boot.lds
>> > b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/u-boot.lds
>> > index 2cf0b25..36711b0 100644
>> > --- a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/u-boot.lds
>> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/u-boot.lds
>> > @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ SECTIONS
>> >      _FIXUP_TABLE_ = .;
>> >      KEEP(*(.fixup))
>> >    }
>> > -  __got2_entries = ((_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ - _GOT2_TABLE_) >> 2) - 1;
>> > +  __got2_entries = ((_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ - _GOT2_TABLE_) >> 2);
>> >    __fixup_entries = (. - _FIXUP_TABLE_) >> 2;
>>
>> This looks like the correct fix, The relevant code that uses
>> __got2_entries is in start.S:
>>
>> in_ram:
>>
>>         /*
>>          * Relocation Function, r12 point to got2+0x8000
>>          *
>>          * Adjust got2 pointers, no need to check for 0, this code
>>          * already puts a few entries in the table.
>>          */
>>         li      r0,__got2_entries at sectoff@l
>>         la      r3,GOT(_GOT2_TABLE_)
>>         lwz     r11,GOT(_GOT2_TABLE_)
>>         mtctr   r0
>>         sub     r11,r3,r11
>>         addi    r3,r3,-4
>> 1:      lwzu    r0,4(r3)
>>         cmpwi   r0,0
>>         beq-    2f
>>         add     r0,r0,r11
>>         stw     r0,0(r3)
>> 2:      bdnz    1b
>>
>> bdnz does decrement then test for zero so __got2_entries should hold the
>
>> number of entries to relocate.
>>
>> Seems like most(all?) ppc cpu has this error.
>
> Looking at u-boot.lds:
>  .reloc   :
>   {
>     _GOT2_TABLE_ = .;
>     KEEP(*(.got2))
>     KEEP(*(.got))
>     PROVIDE(_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ = . + 4);
>     _FIXUP_TABLE_ = .;
>     KEEP(*(.fixup))
>   }
>   __got2_entries = ((_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ - _GOT2_TABLE_) >> 2) - 1;
>   __fixup_entries = (. - _FIXUP_TABLE_) >> 2;
>
>
> There is something more to this error. Since _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_  is
> defined to
> _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ = . + 4
> there is one extra entry added( for brlr insn inserted by the linker) so
> something is
> amiss here, is there a brlr insns at _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_-4 in your
> u-boot?
>
>  Jocke
>

Here's some more info from a build without any of my modifications.

  $ git describe
  v2014.10-rc2-12-g0b703db

  $ powerpc-e500-linux-gnu-gcc --version
  powerpc-e500-linux-gnu-gcc (Gentoo 4.6.3-r1 p1.9, pie-0.5.2) 4.6.3

  $ grep '_GOT2_TABLE_\|_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_\|__got2_entries' u-boot.map
  0x00000000effb5100                _GOT2_TABLE_ = .
  0x00000000effb7d38                _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_
  0x00000000effb7d48                PROVIDE (_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_, (. + 0x4))
  0x0000000000000b0d                __got2_entries =
(((_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ - _GOT2_TABLE_) >> 0x2) - 0x1)

  $ gdb-multiarch u-boot
  (gdb) disassemble /r 0xeffb5100,0xeffb7d48
  Dump of assembler code from 0xeffb5100 to 0xeffb7d48:
     0xeffb5100 <_GOT2_TABLE_+0>: ef fb 51 00     .long 0xeffb5100
     0xeffb5104 <_GOT2_TABLE_+4>: ef fb 7d 44     dtstsf  cr7,f27,f15
     0xeffb5108 <_GOT2_TABLE_+8>: ef f4 00 00     .long 0xeff40000
     0xeffb510c <_GOT2_TABLE_+12>:        ef f4 01 00     .long 0xeff40100
    <snip>
     0xeffb7d30 <_GOT2_TABLE_+11312>:     ef f6 6e 74     .long 0xeff66e74
     0xeffb7d34 <_GOT2_TABLE_+11316>:     f0 00 00 d0     psq_st  f0,208(r0),0,0
     0xeffb7d38 <_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_+0>:        00 00 00 00     .long 0x0
     0xeffb7d3c <_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_+4>:        00 00 00 00     .long 0x0
     0xeffb7d40 <_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_+8>:        00 00 00 00     .long 0x0
     0xeffb7d44 <_FIXUP_TABLE_+0>:        ef fb 99 d4     .long 0xeffb99d4

So no there is no brlr at the end of the table.

Also I think the __got2_entries calculation does not take into account
the +0x4, ((0xeffb7d38-0xeffb5100)>>2)-1) = 0xb0d

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-08 23:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-08  4:32 [U-Boot] relocation problem on powerpc Chris Packham
2014-09-08  5:18 ` Chris Packham
2014-09-08  5:51 ` Chris Packham
2014-09-08  9:04   ` Joakim Tjernlund
2014-09-08 12:22     ` Joakim Tjernlund
2014-09-08 23:07       ` Chris Packham [this message]
2014-09-09  9:05         ` Joakim Tjernlund
     [not found]         ` <OF3B16B156.FBE577FB-ONC1257D4E.002B79D7-C1257D4E.0031F02B@LocalDomain>
2014-09-09 12:30           ` Joakim Tjernlund
     [not found]           ` <OF76BFAD6D.627B6C04-ONC1257D4E.00438406-C1257D4E.0044AF3E@LocalDomain>
2014-09-09 13:20             ` Joakim Tjernlund
2014-09-10  3:48               ` Chris Packham
2014-09-10  4:03                 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v1] powerpc: add --bss-plt to LDFLAGS Chris Packham
2014-09-10 10:47                   ` Joakim Tjernlund
2014-09-24 22:14                   ` York Sun
2014-09-25  7:26                     ` Joakim Tjernlund
2014-09-25 16:49                   ` York Sun
2014-09-08 22:07     ` [U-Boot] relocation problem on powerpc Chris Packham
2014-09-09  0:22       ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v1] powerpc: Fix off-by-one error in relocation Chris Packham
2014-09-10  3:54         ` Chris Packham
2014-09-08 20:21   ` [U-Boot] relocation problem on powerpc Wolfgang Denk
2014-09-08 22:10     ` Chris Packham
2014-09-09  6:37       ` Wolfgang Denk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFOYHZCJbx4FTOZLr90z6PjuepZyfS0h2X1Rc_z8+TJ+_+0DBg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=judge.packham@gmail.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.