From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754626Ab3JYSMj (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Oct 2013 14:12:39 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f51.google.com ([209.85.215.51]:58485 "EHLO mail-la0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753020Ab3JYSMi (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Oct 2013 14:12:38 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <526A8F54.2040601@gmail.com> References: <1381468543-25334-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <1381468543-25334-7-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <20131025130417.GB20423@ghostprotocols.net> <526A8F54.2040601@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 19:12:36 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] perf tools: Add new comm infrastructure From: Frederic Weisbecker To: David Ahern Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Namhyung Kim , Peter Zijlstra , Paul Mackerras , Ingo Molnar , Namhyung Kim , LKML , Linus Torvalds , Jiri Olsa , Ingo Molnar , Stephane Eranian Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2013/10/25 David Ahern : > On 10/25/13 7:04 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >> >> Em Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 11:56:31AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker escreveu: >>> >>> 2013/10/11 Namhyung Kim : >>>> >>>> From: Frederic Weisbecker >> >> >>>> This new comm infrastructure provides two features: >> >> >>> I was wondering about the fate of these patches. I can resend these or >>> do any rebase if you need to. >> >> >> So I applied the first few patches, but deferred working on this part, >> the comm one, because Jiri Olsa had some problems with it, IIRC, Jiri? >> Can you refresh my mind and ellaborate on it? > > > I also saw some comm related problems with Namhyung's tree. Not sure if it > contained all of Frederic's patches. I have not had time to chase down what > is going on -- just that comm's coming out of perf-script were not correct. Oh I see. It's possible that my massive conversion to use the comm accessor got blind at some point and left over a few things. I remember that I only lightly tested that new comm infrastructure. I mean I tested a lot of "perf report -s foo,bar" combinations for performance comparisons but I haven't tested the perf script and all the other perf tools. I'll rebase these patches and test that wider before resending. Thanks!