From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D0FC4338F for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 01:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4047610CB for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 01:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235566AbhHSBzu (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Aug 2021 21:55:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38944 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235258AbhHSBzt (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Aug 2021 21:55:49 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com (mail-ej1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DB22C061764 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 18:55:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id qk33so9178285ejc.12 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 18:55:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5fJ4QoiERO7mOVVJY9cLiWJv+BztYXiri0O71N77ysY=; b=lQHz0HhI+tmXSNmvB+z7rPxLyvp75l75RCvqUqw387YPqBN7pEp6Q2UxR1dYmkOIWV JlkRpy30JLTQ/Be3XH/BmPAF5G1btNEDI3gFX9WnT1oqTfxjaZ9xscPITNtN7bvGEdRA Ri4aA1GiWiteaIaPR0C+6cPJYN/nTD/5PsxkHhIgv4j+dnQzP8KXL6TO8+fvAUhv69UC eqwPWrLRc48dfGkPwcj9X8Bjnz0xpUX3JvhlUqgh6BVge3ray73UA5ztGYG1or9DeXEH CIs4VOCgMBglsMSZaayal03KAaLEmzwMtiI8CsC1LPkhAF7zsgxh8utjfg+ELx8ChfkR biwg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5fJ4QoiERO7mOVVJY9cLiWJv+BztYXiri0O71N77ysY=; b=cpybUlzLNtbq7MCWy3IBRm4jUJwNxdOdaC+qwMWisIQ5z5QiKg3fV5S51tD3BOlie3 IUGU+N6iak5DSJnZYIeSWtpwKb2WPRvLRAGCzgRzfkWvs7s3GUp5Hk+YzzAvIa8hkFjK KL/jSnw7n1+/lJp5lkDtFF0Y+cMBy4hZjRdFdQ0eCG5qvT/3SUefLcigHEhy7KXpFMoP cmY7FwNHF0JefniHRRltVkYyc5i72/EyK70AXMUjuLroqr5foC6uOjFYcZTbKZTF5/1Q hwMSZvkj2fsQ5u/25i/lF91NvY3f8xijxROhQ8wlFZlUfC9c1qHBWP2OhYawTIKEZitB 3Qng== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530XlqwZ23g0/riFDex20if5R/VEykAzT2bBmgBUixM/Tt46pRWg xk0wStxQIkmv+DRDQVb3xdlvQC0mc/xF3TYEKfwwEoz8rt1ANg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyYvmrVOhbqDOLa/51WUU5KfYudtavo0eLESA8/YbfCWY4HvLHgAC9vU3wIXnj2UUZLfcdsAOXTMOZ69Sf7Fxw= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b094:: with SMTP id x20mr12676768ejy.257.1629338111678; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 18:55:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210702114820.16712-1-varad.gautam@suse.com> <71db10eb-997f-aac1-5d41-3bcbc34c114d@suse.com> <0250F07B-AC9A-4110-B2F4-8537A40D8848@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <0250F07B-AC9A-4110-B2F4-8537A40D8848@gmail.com> From: Zixuan Wang Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 18:54:59 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/6] Initial x86_64 UEFI support To: Nadav Amit Cc: Marc Orr , Varad Gautam , Joerg Roedel , kvm list , Linux Virtualization , Paolo Bonzini , Andrew Jones , bp@suse.de, "Lendacky, Thomas" , "Singh, Brijesh" , "Hyunwook (Wooky) Baek" , Erdem Aktas , Tom Roeder Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 6:42 PM Nadav Amit wrote: > > Just wondering (aka, my standard question): does it work on > bare-metal (putting aside tests that rely on test-devices)? > Hi Nadav, We tested our patches in VMs, and have not tested on bare-metal machines. Regards, Zixuan Wang