On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 04:13:00PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 05:21:30PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > > > > the latest stable kernel. (But even if they do, apparently many > > > device vendors aren't bothering to merge in changes from the SOC's BSP > > > kernel, even if the BSP kernel is getting -stable updates.) > > > > It would be pretty irresponsible for device vendors to be merging BSP > > trees, they're generally development things with ongoing feature updates > > that might interact badly with things the system integrator has done > > rather than something stable enough to just merge constantly. > > So the question is who actually uses -stable kernels, and does it make > sense for it even to be managed in a git tree? > > Very few people will actually be merging them, and in fact maybe > having a patch queue which is checked into git might actually work > better, since it sounds like most people are just cherry-picking > specific patches. > > This is exactly what stable-queue.git is. It has been around for a long time, and fairly helpful for cherry-picking specific patches or testing queued patches before an rc is called out. Justin